![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would bet that over 99% of all graded cards today are modern or ultra modern. This market used to be split between PSA and Beckett until the pandemic grading explosion happened. Then both companies shut down and younger collectors decided to give SGC a try because they still wanted to flip gem mint raw modem cards, and really, SGC was their only option at the time. This was their moment. They had the opportunity to capture significant market share overnight. An entirely new ocean of submitters showed up on their doorstep with boxes full of cards. But the modern market rejected them. SGC 10s often barely outsold PSA 9s in some sports, and couldn't even come close to PSA 10 prices. The problem wasn't the graders though. Peter's fatal mistake was believing that the ultra modern collectors would love their slabs because of the new tuxedo look with the black & white flips. Don't get me wrong, I like the look, it's certainly a huge improvement over the green old school flips, but just changing the flip was never going to be enough. They needed to change their slabs too. They're just way too big and bulky. The ultra modern guys started getting them in hand and thought, "WTF am I supposed to do with these?" They don't fit inside most storage solutions that the kids are carrying around these days, and they're just unnecessarily bulky. And they really do look cheap when compared to some of the nicer slabs. The long time, hard core vintage collectors here don't mind. We're used to the slabs, and to change them now would just be annoying since all of our other cards are in the dollar store slabs that they use currently. So we want our vintage stuff to match. But they really should have invested in a new modern looking slab for all these ultra modern cards that were being submitted. CSG absolutely nailed this when they came out with their new slabs. They are the nicest looking slabs on the market, and it's not even close. And when the hobby rejected their ugly green flips, they quickly corrected their mistake and redesigned them. And their slabs are the same size as PSA, and even stack perfectly with PSA slabs, so collectors can store them together in a way that looks clean and fits together nicely. SGC really missed an opportunity here. If they had offered a new slab design, while still offering the choice of the old one for those of us who still want them, then I think they could have made some serious progress toward closing that gap between them and PSA. But they failed to see that this was a move they needed to take. Peter thought that all the market cared about was fair, accurate, and consistent grades with good turnaround times. He was wrong. The market also cares deeply about the product itself. And it rejected their slabs. I don't know if it's too late to make that change now. It might be. But I wish they had offered two different slabs. One for vintage guys, and a nicer looking newer one for ultra modern. And a registry. Had they done this, I think they would be in a much better place today than they've suddenly found themselves in. But now that the ultra modern market has collapsed, especially ultra modern base cards, there's just no value at all in sending most of these cards off to SGC anymore. And they need those cards to stay afloat.
Brian Gray predicted, "it's going to be a race to $10". I think he's right. And I think SGC might end up going back to being just the vintage card specialists they were before. They failed to capture the modern market when they had the chance. I think CSG will be the beneficiaries of that.
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Probably the internet. I hear it's undefeated. Why, which part/s do you disagree with? I didn't think anything I said would be all that surprising. Was it the 99% estimate? You think that should be closer to 95% or something? Surely you don't think it's far off, right?
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I wonder whether there was any change (up or down) on the number of prewar submissions, before vs during and now post Covid. I bet there was none.
I tend to agree with Snowman that the massive influx of grading demand came from modern, which, for me, includes junk wax 1980’s and 1990’s issues of all sports (not just baseball). I bet there was an uptick in post 1950 cards as well, but I doubt that was the jet fuel that fed the Covid grading boom. I think it’s almost all modern. One thing to remember is that prewar has a pretty “sticky” collector base. Maybe it’s our age, relative socio-economic position, or love for old things, but prewar collectors tend to hold their cards and view them as collections more than investments. As a result, the fortunes of prewar (including who is grading what) is likely a lot less fickle than modern cards I think SGC is absolutely referring to modern(ish) in the video and I think their business, like all graders, boomed and now may start to bust (a little) because of modern. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The baby will get thrown out with the bathwater. After the blue chips tank a little, there will be great opportunities to buy some of these rarities. At least you have stuff you want to collect, instead of stuff you want to sell for more.
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would normally agree with you, however until we see major auction house numbers on key vintage pre-war and post-war take a 30% hit from their Covid boom highs I don’t see any deals coming our way on the good stuff. It’s too far gone, mediocre stuff yes, good stuff, no. If we want it bad enough we are all gonna have to pay and pay up.
Last edited by Johnny630; 10-09-2022 at 08:19 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Good news.......bad news | BabyRuth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-16-2021 02:03 PM |
Some Cool News - Mick Chosen For Topps Museum Exhibit - PICS & TV NEWS LINK ADDED! | MattyC | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 57 | 11-25-2015 07:40 PM |
An interesting article about autographs NY Daily News-and it is not a bad news story | RichardSimon | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 13 | 07-10-2012 12:57 PM |
Help with good news/bad news value | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 05-26-2005 02:02 PM |
the good news and the bad news | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-10-2001 10:54 PM |