1933 Uncle Jacks INSANE PSA Grade/Comparison (Video)

[Pat R]

I don't collect or follow these but I think this would get a 1 from any of the grading company's.

03.jpg

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Pat R

I don't collect or follow these but I think this would get a 1 from any of the grading company's.

Attachment 534568

The definition of a 1.
.

[Jws57]

Originally Posted by Leon

The definition of a 1.
.

Thanks. And maybe as of now. But see Rhotchkiss' post. Maybe I'm stuck on how they used to grade and how the card should grade.

[raulus]

Originally Posted by Pat R

I don't collect or follow these but I think this would get a 1 from any of the grading company's.

Attachment 534568

And now the truth comes out.

No matter how great the front, if the back is a mess, they’re going to give you a low grade.

Way to hide it, though.

[Jws57]

Originally Posted by raulus

And now the truth comes out.

No matter how great the front, if the back is a mess, they’re going to give you a low grade.

Way to hide it, though.

'Way to hide it' - Right. It wasn't about that - you obviously missed the entire point. The front of the PSA 1 on ebay vs mine was the point.

[raulus]

Originally Posted by Jws57

'Way to hide it' - Right. It wasn't about that - you obviously missed the entire point. The front of the PSA 1 on ebay vs mine was the point.

I guess you missed the point that they grade the whole card, not just the front.

[Jws57]

Originally Posted by raulus

I guess you missed the point that they grade the whole card, not just the front.

Idiot.

[raulus]

Originally Posted by Jws57

Idiot.

Thanks. I agree with you now.

[Jws57]

Originally Posted by raulus

Thanks. I agree with you now.

Just don't be a punk dude. It'd be a lot different if we were actually having this conversation face to face. You act like I'm 'concealing' or 'hiding' the back. The point of the video was showing both fronts of the card and regardless - I still believe it's a terrible grade.

[Jws57]

Originally Posted by raulus

And now the truth comes out.

No matter how great the front, if the back is a mess, they’re going to give you a low grade.

Way to hide it, though.

And 'low grade' - fine. Just not a 1.

[raulus]

Originally Posted by Jws57

And 'low grade' - fine. Just not a 1.

Hard to tell from the scans, but it looks like it was glued down at one point, and now you have paper loss plus a bunch of glue residue on the back.

But maybe you can give us more detail about whether that’s accurate?

[Peter_Spaeth]

They don't grade the front and back separately and average the grades, as far as I know. A back defect can certainly take the grade all the way down, depending on what it is.

[Jws57]

Originally Posted by Pat R

I don't collect or follow these but I think this would get a 1 from any of the grading company's.

Attachment 534568

Thanks