Anyone with experience involving CHARGEBACKS/Ebay Seller Protection? surfe-3 scammer

[Popcorn]

If it’s below signature requirements and was delivered to his confirmed address you are good. that’s all you can do. His beef is with the post office.

edit: not sure why AG is not applied to P.O. Boxes. you have to register your name with the box.

[bobbyw8469]

Originally Posted by Popcorn

If it’s below signature requirements and was delivered to his confirmed address you are good. that’s all you can do. His beef is with the post office.

Did you see the YouTube video I posted?? The guy is a scam artist. He buy's SGC A cards...breaks them out to sell them raw......and gets his money back from the sellers.

[Popcorn]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

Did you see the YouTube video I posted?? The guy is a scam artist. He buy's SGC A cards...breaks them out to sell them raw......and gets his money back from the sellers.

Yeah that sucks, big reasons why they have AG now. If you call and talk to a high value claim rep I’m sure they will help you out. Good luck!

[Lorewalker]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

Did you see the YouTube video I posted?? The guy is a scam artist. He buy's SGC A cards...breaks them out to sell them raw......and gets his money back from the sellers.

The bubble mailer the seller was opening in the video appeared to have been taped on one edge that had clearly been opened. Maybe the buyer reused a mailer? Anyway, as to your question, as long as you printed the label on eBay, sent it to the address that was on that label and it was delivered, you will be in the clear for a chargeback. Your funds will be held until eBay verifies that and then released.

[bobbyw8469]

The weight was a dead giveaway. The seller shipped out a 5 ounce package and got back a 1 ounce package. That guy is a scam artist. He has been blocked.

[Directly]

Depending on the sale price any sale over 600/insured a signature is required-I send registered for peace of mind depending on the value. In your case the item was delivered, so have them file the insurance claim if applicable--I have only had to use my private insurance carrier one time so far because the Postal Insurance wouldn't pay my claim--

[bobbyw8469]

Follow up to this scammer. I tried to warn others about this guy by following up on the feedback I left for him. Ebay deleted it. Why would they do that?

[raulus]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

Follow up to this scammer. I tried to warn others about this guy by following up on the feedback I left for him. Ebay deleted it. Why would they do that?

Sure makes you wonder what kind of an operation they’re running over there.

I wonder if the other user disputed it, so they took a preliminary measure to delete it while they “investigate”?

[bobbyw8469]

Originally Posted by raulus

Sure makes you wonder what kind of an operation they’re running over there.

I wonder if the other user disputed it, so they took a preliminary measure to delete it while they “investigate”?

What is there to investigate?? He has a history of scamming sellers out of their cards and getting his money back.

[D. Bergin]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

Follow up to this scammer. I tried to warn others about this guy by following up on the feedback I left for him. Ebay deleted it. Why would they do that?

Not allowed to leave negative feedback for buyers.....or negative "positive" feedback either. Even if they are a scammer. Gives people the idea Ebay may not be a completely safe platform to transact business on.

[Jim65]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

Follow up to this scammer. I tried to warn others about this guy by following up on the feedback I left for him. Ebay deleted it. Why would they do that?

If you leave a false positive, EBay will remove it and can suspend your account for misuse of feedback. Be careful. It doesn't seem right in some circumstances but it is what it is.

[bobbyw8469]

Originally Posted by Jim65

If you leave a false positive, EBay will remove it and can suspend your account for misuse of feedback. Be careful. It doesn't seem right in some circumstances but it is what it is.

It wasn't really a false positive though. It was a little known and seldom used provision called "reply to feedback received". It is perfect for situations such as this.