PWCC expands its lending activities

[Rhotchkiss]

I do not use a vault. But I do think the vault concept is a great idea. Not only does it legally avoid state tax (if the vault is in a tax exempt state and the card is held there long enough), but it’s an apparently very safe place to store valuable assets. Would people question someone who had their cards sent to a Bank of America safety deposit box located in Delaware (or Oregon)? This is very similar to that, except it’s PWCC/Goldin/EBay, etc instead of Bank of America.

If you trust the vault owner (and that’s a legit “if”), and you don’t care about seeing and touching your cards on a regular basis… than why not? This especially true if you are buying expensive cards and savings tens of thousands on taxes. And you don’t have to worry about theft, fire, flood, etc., can use these cards as collateral for loans, have a third party inventory and track your cards, and you can resell them right there without having to deal with mail.

Meanwhile, you are going to see generic vaults pop up all over. Banks are closing brick and mortar locations, and with them, the safety deposits contained therein. There will be a shift to private vaults (or safety deposit spaces). It’s no different than self storage for expensive/important stuff. The vault is for cards specifically, but it’s coming on a more general, mainstream level

Regarding state taxes- it is not avoidance if the card is sent and remains in the tax exempt state for a meaningful duration. I am not sure what that is, but 2 years is most definitely sufficient. It’s also sufficient if it’s sent there and leaves within months bc it’s sold to another. There are real and substantial business reasons for sending your cards to a vault, especially if they are assets, that have nothing to do with tax avoidance - safe protection, storage, serve as collateral for a loan, third party inventory/tracking/reporting (they make your collection “spreadsheets”), ease of resale, etc.

[Johnny630]

This is Desperate. I''LL CONTINUE TO AVOID PWCC AT ALL COST.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Johnny630

This is Desperate. I''LL CONTINUE TO AVOID PWCC AT ALL COST.

Why is it desperate? Brent is smart and sees ways to generate revenue.

[Dead-Ball-Hitter]

Originally Posted by Johnny630

This is Desperate. I''LL CONTINUE TO AVOID PWCC AT ALL COST.

I agree, dishonest people don’t just take a shower and become clean. I take my business elsewhere.

[Peter_Spaeth]

I do think many people use the vault option to avoid taxes and take their cards out of the vault very quickly, and then fail to pay their state the taxes that automatically would have been collected by ebay.

[raulus]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

I do think many people use the vault option to avoid taxes and take their cards out of the vault very quickly, and then fail to pay their state the taxes that automatically would have been collected by ebay.

I guess living in Oregon, I forget that everyone else gets to pay sales taxes, sometimes up to 10%.

[raulus]

Originally Posted by raulus

I guess living in Oregon, I forget that everyone else gets to pay sales taxes, sometimes up to 10%.

And there goes my competitive advantage when competing against other bidders for high priced items!

[perezfan]

Originally Posted by raulus

I guess living in Oregon, I forget that everyone else gets to pay sales taxes, sometimes up to 10%.

Or OVER 10% if you live just one state north of you.

[raulus]

Originally Posted by perezfan

Or OVER 10% if you live just one state north of you.

If it makes you feel any better, with single party hegemony here in Oregon, our politicos are working hard to implement a sales tax. As with all taxes, they will sell us all on the low rate, but it will just be a matter of time until we rival WA. Plus we have among the highest state income tax rates in the country, whereas you have none!

[Johnny630]

Collectors I know are not interested in using this kind of service. They want the cards in their possession. Investors/Day Traders May Be Intrigued by this Kind of Like Buying Stock on Leverage, take out a loan against your cards in their vault. If they drop your SOL, you still owe back the loan difference Once they sell your card at less than your loan. I guess this is where we are at...PWCC THE NEW BROKERAGE HOUSE FOR TRADING CARD ASSETS. WHAT A BEAUTIFUL STORY.

PWCC THE E TRADE OF SPORT CARD'S

[G1911]

I’m fine with traders and investors never actually even seeing their cards. I’m great with people finding legal means to keep more of their money instead of getting it taken by the state. But if a person chooses to leave their cards with PWCC, well, they don’t deserve what happens but it will be difficult to have any sympathy for them.

[Johnny630]

Originally Posted by G1911

I’m fine with traders and investors never actually even seeing their cards. I’m great with people finding legal means to keep more of their money instead of getting it taken by the state. But if a person chooses to leave their cards with PWCC, well, they don’t deserve what happens but it will be difficult to have any sympathy for them.

Boom, agree!

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by G1911

I’m fine with traders and investors never actually even seeing their cards. I’m great with people finding legal means to keep more of their money instead of getting it taken by the state. But if a person chooses to leave their cards with PWCC, well, they don’t deserve what happens but it will be difficult to have any sympathy for them.

What do you envision happening?

[BobC]

Originally Posted by Johnny630

Collectors I know are not interested in using this kind of service. They want the cards in their possession. Investors/Day Traders May Be Intrigued by this Kind of Like Buying Stock on Leverage, take out a loan against your cards in their vault. If they drop your SOL, you still owe back the loan difference Once they sell your card at less than your loan. I guess this is where we are at...PWCC THE NEW BROKERAGE HOUSE FOR TRADING CARD ASSETS. WHAT A BEAUTIFUL STORY.

PWCC THE E TRADE OF SPORT CARD'S

True, but say they buy a '33 Goudey Ruth card for $33K off Ebay. Sending it to a vault in a state with no sales could easily save them $2K-$3K or more, in sales tax they would otherwise have to pay. You may have to leave the Ruth in the vault for a while, but you could buy a few more items with that saved money, no?

[Rhotchkiss]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

I do think many people use the vault option to avoid taxes and take their cards out of the vault very quickly, and then fail to pay their state the taxes that automatically would have been collected by ebay.

That is tax avoidance, and those people could get in trouble. Also, it would make sense if the vault was required to collect and pay over state taxes for items removed from a vault and sent to a tax state within X months of receipt. I don’t know if such a law/requirement exists.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss

That is tax avoidance, and those people could get in trouble. Also, it would make sense if the vault was required to collect and pay over state taxes for items removed from a vault and sent to a tax state within X months of receipt. I don’t know if such a law/requirement exists.

I believe it is up to the individual to pay state use tax, I can't see how that is the vault owner's burden.

[raulus]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

I believe it is up to the individual to pay state use tax, I can't see how that is the vault owner's burden.

I’m guessing it’s just a matter of time until CA and other states get wise to the vaults and start requiring reporting to get their use tax from the collector. I just don’t see the states being willing to forego that much revenue without a fight.

[glchen]

Originally Posted by raulus

I’m guessing it’s just a matter of time until CA and other states get wise to the vaults and start requiring reporting to get their use tax from the collector. I just don’t see the states being willing to forego that much revenue without a fight.

If the Feds or states wanted to collect more taxes, it'd probably be easier for them to extend to PWCC and auction houses to send 1099s to consignors who sell over $600 like they already do for ebay.

[Rhotchkiss]

Phil, I agree with you 100% that this is likely not a good deal for the borrowers. And I also agree that it’s real good to be the lender on this one. Nevertheless, the arrangement provides liquidity for a relatively illiquid asset and I feel consenting adults should be able to transact however they choose, even if it’s more dangerous for one party. And, I believe that people should be responsible for their actions- if you are a big enough boy to buy a card and borrow against it, then don’t bitch when you lose your card to pay back the lender.

Regarding a propped up industry, this does smack of the Big Short in many ways (in a mini sense). Similarly, a super-high stock market propped up by buyers on margin loans. It most definitely appears that this will have an unhappy ending for some; I suspect most own the shiny stuff. But that’s how we learn and grow. Maybe it takes some pain to get regulation and oversight. Ultimately, these loans have utility.

[Rhotchkiss]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

I believe it is up to the individual to pay state use tax, I can't see how that is the vault owner's burden.

I am sure there is something agency or bailment law that states could use to impose some burden on the vault. I know it’s somewhat different, but if eBay has to issue 1099s to anyone who sells more than $600 (or something like that), than I am sure “they” can find a way to make a vault collect sales taxes on item received and released within a certain period.

It’s a brave new world. It will be interesting to see how this shakes out. The states love all of this new revenue. They will fight hard to ensure it if they start losing enough to vaults.

Personally, I don’t think state sales taxes should be due on items bought for investment. We don’t pay sales tax on stock, bonds, and precious metals in many states. Why cards held for investment? We don’t “use” or consume cards.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss

I am sure there is something agency or bailment law that states could use to impose some burden on the vault. I know it’s somewhat different, but if eBay has to issue 1099s to anyone who sells more than $600 (or something like that), than I am sure “they” can find a way to make a vault collect sales taxes on item received and released within a certain period.

It’s a brave new world. It will be interesting to see how this shakes out. The states love all of this new revenue. They will fight hard to ensure it if they start losing enough to vaults.

Personally, I don’t think state sales taxes should be due on items bought for investment. We don’t pay sales tax on stock, bonds, and precious metals in many states. Why cards held for investment? We don’t “use” or consume cards.

I meant that under current law there is no such burden. Absent some constitutional impediment there can always be new laws and regulations.

[Kidnapped18]

I think this is great news! PWCC saw a need and filled it for their customers. I have never had a problem with PWCC and still use their platform to purchase cards most recently this week. I even have a handful of cards in the Vault. I know not all on this board agree with or deal with PWCC but I like the loan concept and cards as collateral.

FWIW PWCC collects state taxes when you pay for the items and have them shipped to you.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Kidnapped18

I think this is great news! PWCC saw a need and filled it for their customers. I have never had a problem with PWCC and still use their platform to purchase cards most recently this week. I even have a handful of cards in the Vault. I know not all on this board agree with or deal with PWCC but I like the loan concept and cards as collateral.

FWIW PWCC collects state taxes when you pay for the items and have them shipped to you.

As seller, but not when you buy a card off ebay and have it shipped to the vault, as I understand it.

[Schlesinj]

I know the Alt platform announced they would be offering a similar program several months ago. If I remember correctly the rate was nearly 10% and the loan to value was something like 60% of perceived value.

So now people can leverage off their house value or stock portfolio or sports collectibles or some type of unsecured loan. You can buy a fraction of a stock, baseball card or a house too. Very interesting times we live in.

[Casey2296]

Two words: Leverage and betting on the come.

It's a nice lending model and very profitable, the risk is all on you and the asset. When the chips are down they don't even have to come after you, they just lock down your asset which they already have in their possession. I'm in lending and I would love to read the fine print on this program and would probably participate in it as a lender.

You have a collection of cards that are valued at today's value but if your precious 48 Jackie drops in value I'm keeping your card and you owe me money and I'll come get it.

Same model as mortgage backed securities in 2008, or putting 20k in card purchases on you credit card and not doing the math. My vote is no if you want to sleep at night.

[Republicaninmass]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

It won't happen unless someone makes it happen. Who is that someone?

Originally Posted by Schlesinj

I know the Alt platform announced they would be offering a similar program several months ago. If I remember correctly the rate was nearly 10% and the loan to value was something like 60% of perceived value.

So now people can leverage off their house value or stock portfolio or sports collectibles or some type of unsecured loan. You can buy a fraction of a stock, baseball card or a house too. Very interesting times we live in.

This will have the same effect as "negative AM" loans and 100% financing did on the housing market, which led to great financial crisis. I just don't think it will wreak havoc any further than the hobby itself. Although a little different to the hype when I was collecting in the 80s, it certainly does rhyme.

[Casey2296]

[QUOTE=Schlesinj;2261823If I remember correctly the rate was nearly 10% and the loan to value was something like 60% of perceived value.[/QUOTE]

That would be my model, although 60% might be a little high. You can also do a deep dive and offer 8% on Ruth, Gehrig, Cobb, etc. and 12% on the shiny stuff, adjusting the ltv accordingly.

[BobC]

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss

That is tax avoidance, and those people could get in trouble. Also, it would make sense if the vault was required to collect and pay over state taxes for items removed from a vault and sent to a tax state within X months of receipt. I don’t know if such a law/requirement exists.

We've discussed this before. To my knowledge no state has a period of time in their sales and use tax laws for this specific situation. However, I had mentioned once before how California has a specific 1 year threshold for vehicles brought into California. Bought it less than a year before bringing it into CA and you owe CA the difference between the sales tax you would have paid them had you originally bought the vehicle in CA, less whatever sales tax you did pay to another state when you bought it. Own the vehicle a year or more before bringing it into CA, and CA gets no sales/use tax.

So the concept of moving assets you own from one state to another doesn't necessarily and/or automatically trigger sales/use tax being owed to the state you're moving them into. If you leave cards in a vault for a reasonable period of time before taking them out and to your home, your resident state will likely not come looking for sales/use tax on those cards. We just haven't had this issue come up in any courts yet, to my knowledge, nor had any state spell out in their statutes how long you'd have to leave the cards in a vault for before you could then safely bring them home without any sales/use tax being due your resident state. At least not yet.

[oldjudge]

Originally Posted by BobC

We've discussed this before. To my knowledge no state has a period of time in their sales and use tax laws for this specific situation. However, I had mentioned once before how California has a specific 1 year threshold for vehicles brought into California. Bought it less than a year before bringing it into CA and you owe CA the difference between the sales tax you would have paid them had you originally bought the vehicle in CA, less whatever sales tax you did pay to another state when you bought it. Own the vehicle a year or more before bringing it into CA, and CA gets no sales/use tax.

So the concept of moving assets you own from one state to another doesn't necessarily and/or automatically trigger sales/use tax being owed to the state you're moving them into. If you leave cards in a vault for a reasonable period of time before taking them out and to your home, your resident state will likely not come looking for sales/use tax on those cards. We just haven't had this issue come up in any courts yet, to my knowledge, nor had any state spell out in their statutes how long you'd have to leave the cards in a vault for before you could then safely bring them home without any sales/use tax being due your resident state. At least not yet.

It seems like it would be very easy for states with sales tax on collectibles to close this loophole.

[BobC]

Originally Posted by oldjudge

It seems like it would be very easy for states with sales tax on collectibles to close this loophole.

Not necessarily. The idea of charging sales tax on an item being shipped to a buyer is that the sales tax is charged based on where an item is ultimately to be stored or used. It is different from when you actually walk into a store and buy something and take physical possession of the item right there. In that case it doesn't matter what state you may actually live in, you pay sales tax to the state where you physically took possession of an item, based on where the store you bought it from is located. If you were on vacation in say Oregon, and bought some mementoes, collectibles, and such, and then took everything back home with you, to say California, you aren't going to be met at the CA border by one of its sales tax agents demanding you pay CA sales tax on items you're now bringing back into your home state. You wouldn't owe any use tax to CA as you already paid the applicable sales tax to the state the store you bought and took possession of the items you purchased was in, even if it was Oregon that has no sales tax.

There is no law anywhere that says you have to keep everything at your home residence. So if you do decide to have cards you buy sent and kept at an out of state location, that is perfectly acceptable, and something I don't think any state can change by simple legislation. And to then move items from one state to another shouldn't automatically cause the owner to suddenly owe sales taxes on items moved, should it? To argue otherwise could end up opening a huge can of worms. Like for example anytime someone moves from one state to another, and takes all their belongings with them, are they now going to be subject to having all their belongings inspected by someone from the state they are moving into, and potentially getting assessed a sales/use tax on all their belongings they brought with them? That would go over with the voting public like a ton of crap, but is intrinsically the same as storing your cards in one state, and then deciding later to move them elsewhere. And since supposedly not everyone using a vault is doing so just to evade sales taxes, passing any legislation that potentially proves detrimental to them likely won't be viewed in a kind light either. It is not entirely as black and white a question as one may initially think.

[Lorewalker]

Originally Posted by BobC

Not necessarily. The idea of charging sales tax on an item being shipped to a buyer is that the sales tax is charged based on where an item is ultimately to be stored or used. It is different from when you actually walk into a store and buy something and take physical possession of the item right there. In that case it doesn't matter what state you may actually live in, you pay sales tax to the state where you physically took possession of an item, based on where the store you bought it from is located. If you were on vacation in say Oregon, and bought some mementoes, collectibles, and such, and then took everything back home with you, to say California, you aren't going to be met at the CA border by one of its sales tax agents demanding you pay CA sales tax on items you're now bringing back into your home state. You wouldn't owe any use tax to CA as you already paid the applicable sales tax to the state the store you bought and took possession of the items you purchased was in, even if it was Oregon that has no sales tax.

There is no law anywhere that says you have to keep everything at your home residence. So if you do decide to have cards you buy sent and kept at an out of state location, that is perfectly acceptable, and something I don't think any state can change by simple legislation. And to then move items from one state to another shouldn't automatically cause the owner to suddenly owe sales taxes on items moved, should it? To argue otherwise could end up opening a huge can of worms. Like for example anytime someone moves from one state to another, and takes all their belongings with them, are they now going to be subject to having all their belongings inspected by someone from the state they are moving into, and potentially getting assessed a sales/use tax on all their belongings they brought with them? That would go over with the voting public like a ton of crap, but is intrinsically the same as storing your cards in one state, and then deciding later to move them elsewhere. And since supposedly not everyone using a vault is doing so just to evade sales taxes, passing any legislation that potentially proves detrimental to them likely won't be viewed in a kind light either. It is not entirely as black and white a question as one may initially think.

Hey Bob,

Just thinking out loud but while there is no law that says that everything we buy has to be sent and kept in our homes, it is clear most, some, many of the purchases that are going to vaults are not necessarily staying at the vaults. The vaults are a brief stopping point for the purchase which the buyer has every intention of taking physical possession of as soon as possible. I think that is where the gray area may not be so gray.

How that could be enforced, I dunno and since the vault concept is relatively new and I have no statistics on what percentage of the items that are shipped to them stay with them. It is entirely possible the tax evasion practice is not material enough to be worth the effort. I also think it would would be complex to track purchases (entering and leaving the vaults) even if that was the burden of each vault to do on a quarterly basis.

Chase

[raulus]

Originally Posted by BobC

Not necessarily. The idea of charging sales tax on an item being shipped to a buyer is that the sales tax is charged based on where an item is ultimately to be stored or used. It is different from when you actually walk into a store and buy something and take physical possession of the item right there. In that case it doesn't matter what state you may actually live in, you pay sales tax to the state where you physically took possession of an item, based on where the store you bought it from is located. If you were on vacation in say Oregon, and bought some mementoes, collectibles, and such, and then took everything back home with you, to say California, you aren't going to be met at the CA border by one of its sales tax agents demanding you pay CA sales tax on items you're now bringing back into your home state. You wouldn't owe any use tax to CA as you already paid the applicable sales tax to the state the store you bought and took possession of the items you purchased was in, even if it was Oregon that has no sales tax.
.

I’m pretty sure this is exactly the situation why use tax exists - for people buying stuff in low or no sales tax states and then taking it home with them to high sales tax states.

You’re not met at the border by a tax agent.

But the law does say that you owe use tax.

It’s just that no one actually ever pays it.

[oldjudge]

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss

That is tax avoidance, and those people could get in trouble. Also, it would make sense if the vault was required to collect and pay over state taxes for items removed from a vault and sent to a tax state within X months of receipt. I don’t know if such a law/requirement exists.

Thinking back to my tax class that is tax evasion. Tax avoidance is good, tax evasion is breaking the law.

tax avoidance—An action taken to lessen tax liability and maximize after-tax income. tax evasion—The failure to pay or a deliberate underpayment of taxes.

[BobC]

Originally Posted by oldjudge

Thinking back to my tax class that is tax evasion. Tax avoidance is good, tax evasion is breaking the law.

tax avoidance—An action taken to lessen tax liability and maximize after-tax income. tax evasion—The failure to pay or a deliberate underpayment of taxes.

Absolutely correct Jay. Had often told clients, tax evasion is a crime, but tax avoidance is your constitutional and God given right. LOL

In Ryan's defense, I'm guessing he just mixed up the terminology and was referring to the idea of people using a vault purposely to get out of paying sales tax. And doing so by almost immediately pulling out cards they had sent to a vault and having them sent to their residence.

However, as Peter later pointed out, I don't believe it would be the vault company's responsibility to ever collect and remit sales taxes to any state on behalf of a card's owner. The vault company only provides a storage service, and to my knowledge has nothing to do with actual sale or purchase of items, nor in the handling of any monies involved in such sales. In the case of PWCC and Goldin, who both provide vault services, I believe their vault operations are set up as/in completely different business entities from their auction/sales businesses. It would be stupid business practice to have their different operations all in one single entity, and I don't think either of them are stupid by any means. As Peter stated, it would most likely be considered a use tax owed by the individual who bought the card and then took it out of a vault right away to add to their personal collection at their home. How a state is going to find out about such individuals who may may be abusing this practice, remains to be seen.

[Snowman]

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss

That is tax avoidance, and those people could get in trouble. Also, it would make sense if the vault was required to collect and pay over state taxes for items removed from a vault and sent to a tax state within X months of receipt. I don’t know if such a law/requirement exists.

When I tried to have cards from my vault sent to my home address in CA, PWCC told me they would have to charge me sales tax unless I could provide them with a CA state resale permit.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Snowman

When I tried to have cards from my vault sent to my home address in CA, PWCC told me they would have to charge me sales tax unless I could provide them with a CA state resale permit.

Interesting. PWCC isn't making a sale, so I am surprised they feel obligated to do that. I thought sales tax was only collected in connection with a sale.

[Mark17]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Interesting. PWCC isn't making a sale, so I am surprised they feel obligated to do that. I thought sales tax was only collected in connection with a sale.

Suppose Biff, in Portland Oregon, registers an LLC called "The Weigh Station, LLC." The service he provides collectors and investors is, he weighs their collectibles.

So, you live in CA and ask PWCC to send your $100,000 worth of stuff. PWCC says they'll need to collect about $8,000 for the state of CA for sales tax. You say, no, you want it sent to Biff in Oregon, which has no sales tax. Biff receives your stuff, weighs it, charges you $50.00 plus the cost of shipping, and sends you your stuff along with a note saying how much it weighs. He collects no sales tax since he wasn't involved in a sale - he simply rendered a service (just like PSA does when they grade cards.)

If Biff can weigh and ship 20 packages a day, he can make something north of $250k a year. And all he needs is to live near a post office, or Fedex or UPS outlet, and have a bathroom scale.

[raulus]

Originally Posted by Snowman

When I tried to have cards from my vault sent to my home address in CA, PWCC told me they would have to charge me sales tax unless I could provide them with a CA state resale permit.

There you go. Even the good folks at PWCC are above aiding and abetting tax evasion.

And if it also happens to mean that now you're locked into their system, then I guess they won't complain too much about it.

[Mark17]

Originally Posted by Snowman

When I tried to have cards from my vault sent to my home address in CA, PWCC told me they would have to charge me sales tax unless I could provide them with a CA state resale permit.

If that's the case, then people have a substantial disincentive to remove their items from the vault. I can see investors deciding to just leave their inventory there, for PWCC to eventually sell for them, rather than having a major AH sell them, factoring in the hit when removed from PWCC's vault.

As far as borrowing money using inventory in the vault as collateral, I wonder what would (will) happen when the market on a lot of stuff takes a corrective dip. Capital calls to restore the collateral percentage?

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Mark17

If that's the case, then people have a substantial disincentive to remove their items from the vault. I can see investors deciding to just leave their inventory there, for PWCC to eventually sell for them, rather than having a major AH sell them, factoring in the hit when removed from PWCC's vault.

As far as borrowing money using inventory in the vault as collateral, I wonder what would (will) happen when the market on a lot of stuff takes a corrective dip. Capital calls to restore the collateral percentage?

You would think PWCC would not necessarily use current market prices to value collateral, but who knows.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Snowman

When I tried to have cards from my vault sent to my home address in CA, PWCC told me they would have to charge me sales tax unless I could provide them with a CA state resale permit.

I wonder how many people are using the vault on the assumption they won't have to pay sales tax, ever, unless they volunteer it.

Has this happened to anyone else? As a friend points out to me, wouldn't this be a huge story in the hobby if the vault no longer avoided sales tax?

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

I wonder how many people are using the vault on the assumption they won't have to pay sales tax, ever, unless they volunteer it.

Has this happened to anyone else? As a friend points out to me, wouldn't this be a huge story in the hobby if the vault no longer avoided sales tax?

There would be no more vault.
.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Leon

There would be no more vault.
.

That's why Travis' comment really surprised me. I mean even if it's only California requiring PWCC to collect taxes on items it ships out of the vault, that is huge.

[japhi]

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss

I do not use a vault. But I do think the vault concept is a great idea. Not only does it legally avoid state tax (if the vault is in a tax exempt state and the card is held there long enough), but it’s an apparently very safe place to store valuable assets. Would people question someone who had their cards sent to a Bank of America safety deposit box located in Delaware (or Oregon)? This is very similar to that, except it’s PWCC/Goldin/EBay, etc instead of Bank of America.

If you trust the vault owner (and that’s a legit “if”), and you don’t care about seeing and touching your cards on a regular basis… than why not? This especially true if you are buying expensive cards and savings tens of thousands on taxes. And you don’t have to worry about theft, fire, flood, etc., can use these cards as collateral for loans, have a third party inventory and track your cards, and you can resell them right there without having to deal with mail.

Meanwhile, you are going to see genetic vaults pop up all over. Banks are closing brick and mortar locations, and with them, the safety deposits contained therein. There will be a shift to private vaults (or safety deposit spaces). It’s no different than self storage for expensive/important stuff. The vault is for cards specifically, but it’s coming on a more general, mainstream level

Regarding state taxes- it is not avoidance if the card is sent and remains in the tax exempt state for a meaningful duration. I am not sure what that is, but 2 years is most definitely sufficient. It’s also sufficient if it’s sent there and leaves within months bc it’s sold to another. There are real and substantial business reasons for sending your cards to a vault, especially if they are assets, that have nothing to do with tax avoidance - safe protection, storage, serve as collateral for a loan, third party inventory/tracking/reporting (they make your collection “spreadsheets”), ease of resale, etc.

The comp with BAM is a bit ridiculous. Banks are VERY highly regulated, and failure rates are absurdly low.

PWCC may own a vault that has similar features to a bank vault but that's where the similarity ends. The risk in keeping cards in one of these vaults isn't that someone will break in, or there will be a fire. That is marketing and appears it is working. Loss due to theft or fire is covered by insurance.

The real risk is that the business fails, a bankruptcy follows, and your cards are being held / secured by another party. Which has happened in other vault type business, wine for instance. Add in that folks are borrowing against those cards and in the case of a business failure, someone else will have dibs on your stuff.

I know business failure is hard to fathom after the crazy 10 year bull run but large companies fail on the regular, none of us have any idea what PWCC's financials look like.

[rjackson44]

i have a vault at my beach house ,,,this is securty