![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They could be, or might be blank backs. If you take 3 card sections, you eventually have either 1 or 4 cards left over per row. Topps hated waste and those panels are all 4 across, which makes sense. Now they could have just cut up some production sheets but the math works if they were from a small run intended as samples. No way to prove it now of course but it seems like a possible method to me. 5x5 sample/proof/final quadrants also makes sense as those are seen as well in the hobby, as shown in one of the posts above.
Last edited by toppcat; 09-06-2022 at 11:32 AM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2010, 2011, & 2012 Topps Heritage Baseball Advertising/Stamp Panels FS/FT | Tere1071 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 10 | 10-10-2023 09:53 PM |
Question about 1952 Topps Advertising Panels | hharm3 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 09-07-2022 02:59 PM |
1952 topps uncut panels and strips | Republicaninmass | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 15 | 10-27-2019 09:57 AM |
Wttf/wtb heritage advertising panels | Baseball Jack | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 03-28-2013 07:15 AM |
1952 Topps Mantle Tons Of Questions... | mintacular | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 18 | 02-23-2010 06:20 PM |