Survey: Rate each Topps flagship design from 1951-2023. - Net54baseball.com Forums
  NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
 Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
 Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
 Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions
Reload this Page Survey: Rate each Topps flagship design from 1951-2023.
Register NEW Chat! Who's Chatting FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-06-2022, 12:28 AM
isiahfan isiahfan is offline
D@n Di.Pao.la
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 444
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by insidethewrapper View Post
Like the 1957,1959, 1983 and of course 1972 !
About the same for me...also added in the 54
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-06-2022, 01:24 AM
glchen's Avatar
glchen glchen is offline
_G@ґy*€hℯη_
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,005
Default
Completed. Wow, so many of the post 90s designs were terrible, IMHO. it's like they lost all creativity in the design department. My favorites were in the 1950s.
Last edited by glchen; 09-06-2022 at 01:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-06-2022, 07:11 PM
lukewarm_pizza lukewarm_pizza is offline
Elliot
member
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Michigan
Posts: 72
Default Survey results
10 most popular sets: 1952, 1953, 1954, 1972, 1955, 1965, 1956, 1983, 1984, 1963

10 least popular sets: 1995, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2021, 1994, 1997, 2000, 2009, 2003

10 most divisive sets: 1987, 2008, 1951, 2018, 2023, 2007, 2015, 1990, 2021, 2020

10 least divisive sets: 1953, 1958, 1963, 1952, 1985, 1977, 1954, 1966, 1980, 1976

Most popular decade: 1950s

Least popular decade: 1990s

Most divisive decade: 2020s

Least divisive decade: 1960s

578 participants from Net54, Blowout, and Reddit.
Attached Images
File Type: png Means_year.png (86.6 KB, 268 views)
File Type: png Deviations_year.png (82.3 KB, 267 views)
File Type: png Means_sorted.png (88.1 KB, 273 views)
File Type: png Deviations_sorted.png (80.8 KB, 270 views)
File Type: png Means_decade.png (19.6 KB, 265 views)
File Type: png Deviations_decade.png (20.2 KB, 267 views)
Last edited by lukewarm_pizza; 09-06-2022 at 07:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-06-2022, 07:19 PM
bobbvc's Avatar
bobbvc bobbvc is offline
Bob B.
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 980
Default
I'll bet this information would be a lot more valuable if the survey takers were grouped by age.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-06-2022, 07:20 PM
bobbvc's Avatar
bobbvc bobbvc is offline
Bob B.
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 980
Default
Great job though.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-06-2022, 07:33 PM
conor912's Avatar
conor912 conor912 is offline
C0nor D0na.hue
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,298
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbvc View Post
I'll bet this information would be a lot more valuable if the survey takers were grouped by age.
Seems that late decade designs did significantly worse than early-decade, overall. Could be a generational bias?

Cool data!
__________________
Items for sale or trade here UPDATED 3-16-18
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-06-2022, 07:58 PM
BillyCoxDodgers3B BillyCoxDodgers3B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,685
Default
How on earth 1957 didn't at least rank second is beyond me. It's far and away the nicest set IMO and the photography and cards have aged so grandly. I just envisioned 1952 finishing in the top spot no matter what, and don't really have a problem with that.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-06-2022, 11:19 PM
Vintagedeputy's Avatar
Vintagedeputy Vintagedeputy is offline
Jim Reynolds
Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Glen Allen, Va.
Posts: 1,625
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyCox3 View Post
How on earth 1957 didn't at least rank second is beyond me. It's far and away the nicest set IMO and the photography and cards have aged so grandly. I just envisioned 1952 finishing in the top spot no matter what, and don't really have a problem with that.
57’s are just ok to me. 1953-56 is where it’s at, in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-07-2022, 07:39 AM
campyfan39's Avatar
campyfan39 campyfan39 is offline
Chris
Ch.ris Pa.rtin
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,289
Default
Different strokes i guess. 57 to me is the worst design of the 50's by far. Very plain and often the letters are hard to see.
For me:

53
56
59
75
52
64


Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyCox3 View Post
How on earth 1957 didn't at least rank second is beyond me. It's far and away the nicest set IMO and the photography and cards have aged so grandly. I just envisioned 1952 finishing in the top spot no matter what, and don't really have a problem with that.
__________________
[FONT="Lucida Sans Unicode"]CampyFan39
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-06-2022, 08:13 PM
FrankWakefield FrankWakefield is offline
Frank Wakefield
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Franklin KY
Posts: 2,824
Default
+1 for posts 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8.

Golly, 1952's are way over rated. Folks must have rated based on 1952 Mantle card and not the design (really, not much of a design, there).

1967 Topps seem way under rated to me.

That survey covered a bunch of years.

And thanks for the survey and starting the thread.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-06-2022, 09:51 PM
G1911 G1911 is offline
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,501
Default
I am most surprised by 1953 being the least divisive. 1951 is a small game card series I would separate from the main line, but 1953 is unique in that the set is painted portraits instead of colorized or color photos. It’s popular, but it has detractors for this unique approach. I would have expected it to finish well but in the more divisive group, not the #1 least divisive.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
poll, survey, topps

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2023 National Sports Collector Convention less than 365 days away mrreality68 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 24 07-04-2023 04:43 PM
Wtb: Juan soto us300 chrome or flagship Fish 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T 0 03-19-2021 01:25 AM
2018 topps raw sapphire set...what's the going rate for it? bbnut Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) 0 04-29-2020 10:11 AM
NBA Flagship Sets carlsonjok Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum 2 11-15-2018 02:27 PM
T205 design vs T80 design question ? tedzan Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 27 08-19-2018 07:21 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:08 PM.

RSS - Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top

ebay GSB