![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The simple answer is to allocate the cost based on relative values of the items acquired.
Naturally, there’s potentially a lot of room for interpretation there. Some people like to look at various price databases, potentially including SMR, cardtarget, or others that are out there to attempt to assign those relative values. My experience is that almost every item has a potential range of values, and you could spent an entire career trying to get the math right. My approach is to spend a little time on it, get it close enough that it seems reasonable, and then move on. Based on your example, it’s not uncommon for one (or two or three) item(s) to be a lot more valuable than the rest. Certainly it’s possible that $500 of your initial cost should be allocated to the item you sold, so you have no gain on that sale. Naturally, if you go selling 3 or 4 of them for $500 apiece, then you’re going to have a gain in there somewhere! |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Board Feature -related topic threads @ bottom | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 07-15-2009 12:48 AM |
Help with novel, sort of off-topic, but T206-related | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-23-2007 02:01 PM |
Off Topic's......too many recently....polite warning | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-02-2006 12:12 PM |
completely off topic, but baseball related | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 12-07-2004 06:17 AM |
NESFLASH! (warning: slighly off topic) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-25-2003 01:44 PM |