SGC Grading Turnarounds

[bobbyw8469]

They found a price point that works for them.

[gonefishin]

Same here, 5 days total from when I mailed them USPS until I had them back in hand graded. Amazing!

[Natswin2019]

Sent a submission through Nashcards and had them back in about a week. Super fast and impressed so I just sent off another sub

[rdwyer]

Originally Posted by Natswin2019

Sent a submission through Nashcards and had them back in about a week. Super fast and impressed so I just sent off another sub

Same here. But their grading I feel is super harsh.

[Casey2296]

Originally Posted by rdwyer

Same here. But their grading I feel is super harsh.

I prefer SGC but their current graders pass out "A's" like Chiclets on a border-town street. They need a primer that pre-war cards were not always cut to exact specifications at the factory.

[Prof]

Originally Posted by Casey2296

I prefer SGC but their current graders pass out "A's" like Chiclets on a border-town street. They need a primer that pre-war cards were not always cut to exact specifications at the factory.

I thought SGC was a little more relaxed about A's vs numbers. I've heard of at least a few people getting A's from PSA because cards had been in screwdowns. Then, they'd submit to SGC and get number grades.



I've never submitted before, but will probably send a handful soon, with the intent to resell.

I know PSA commands a slight premium, but on the whole, between PSA and SGC, which do you all think is the most fair?

[LACardsGuy]

Originally Posted by rdwyer

Same here. But their grading I feel is super harsh.

Absolutely. Always has been. Maybe it's my imagination, but I have always thought they come in same or lower than PSA.

[Natswin2019]

Originally Posted by rdwyer

Same here. But their grading I feel is super harsh.

I really havent felt hard done by sgc yet. Maybe on a few cards I felt like should have been like .5 or 1 grade higher but nothing super terrible really. Im not super well versed in the standards but have a general idea of what each card should get so im not too terribly disapointed. Granted I submit cards that I want protected for my pc so im not really in it for the money. Maybe that's why im never disappointed.

I've also never submitted to PSA but to reflect on what people have said, it's mostly cause the price and turn around time. I paid good money for my cards, why would I want them stuck in some warehouse for 4 months to a year and have no idea when I would get them back when I could pay a single fee and have them back in under a month. I do think if I had a real banger of a modern card I'd probably pay the fees and send to PSA anyway.

Patrick Kearney

[Tyruscobb]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

They found a price point that works for them.

Bobby, in my humble opinion, this quick turnaround shows that SGC’s prices are too high. SGC having a 2-day turnaround indicates the demand for its grading services is too low. In theory, lowering the price would increase its grading demand and SGC would have a little inventory to work through.

At some point, PSA will have the backlog completed and it’s east coast facility fulling up and running. SGC will is probably waiting for that moment to drop its price. I think it will not have a choice. I like SGC, but, at least for me, $30.00 a card is too high.

[wazoo]

Originally Posted by Tyruscobb

Bobby, in my humble opinion, this quick turnaround shows that SGC’s prices are too high. SGC having a 2-day turnaround indicates the demand for its grading services is too low. In theory, lowering the price would increase its grading demand and SGC would have a little inventory to work through.

At some point, PSA will have the backlog completed and it’s east coast facility fulling up and running. SGC will is probably waiting for that moment to drop its price. I think it will not have a choice. I like SGC, but, at least for me, $30.00 a card is too high.

That’s why their are great sub groups on Facebook that can get it for $24/card. But I agree with your logic here.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Accurate and fair, not overly harsh, grading would seem FAR more important than turnaround time as long as that time is within reason. I frankly don't understand the obsession with turnaround time as evidenced by all the duplicative threads on the same topic, are people THAT impatient/in need of instant gratification? To me if a card comes back super fast graded one or two grades low, that's a disaster, not something to celebrate.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Accurate and fair, not overly harsh, grading would seem FAR more important than turnaround time as long as that time is within reason. I frankly don't understand the obsession with turnaround time as evidenced by all the duplicative threads on the same topic, are people THAT impatient?

Yes
.

[Orioles1954]

Harsher grading is not better grading.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Orioles1954

Harsher grading is not better grading.

Especially if your cards already, for the most part, sell at a discount.

[ClementeFanOh]

PeterSpaeth- While we are on the subject of "not understanding" things, I
think you're falling into your own category. I am not "obsessed" with card
grading turnarounds, I think appropriate turnaround is an expectation of
people we pay in advance (!), to know their stuff. There appear to be 2
major camps at play in these grading chats. The first is people who expect
their graders to get the job done before the collector dies of old age. The
others, tacitly at least, put up with PSAs lag times and unpredictable grading
because of hammer values. The complicating factor currently in play is both
PSA/SGC seem to regard vintage as the whipping boy of the card world,
and it affects consumers of both products. There's no "obsession", at least
not with me- my family and job consume the vast majority of my time and
this is an avocation. We are on a card forum after all, so it stands to reason
that controversial or persistently unresolved topics will reoccur. This is the
place for those chats, and people are free to ignore them without
commenting (lest they become obsessed with commenting about the
perceived obsession). Trent King

[BobbyStrawberry]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Accurate and fair, not overly harsh, grading would seem FAR more important than turnaround time as long as that time is within reason. I frankly don't understand the obsession with turnaround time as evidenced by all the duplicative threads on the same topic, are people THAT impatient/in need of instant gratification? To me if a card comes back super fast graded one or two grades low, that's a disaster, not something to celebrate.

Call me impatient, but I find the lack of clear expectations about PSA turnaround times unacceptable. Don't they still have submissions from early 2021 that they haven't finished grading?

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry

Call me impatient, but I find the lack of clear expectations about PSA turnaround times unacceptable. Don't they still have submissions from early 2021 that they haven't finished grading?

I qualified my statement by saying "within reason." 1.5 years (and a friend of mine and I are still waiting on a sub from early 2021) is not within reason.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Trent as I am sure you deduced, the main point of my post, by which I stand, is that IMO fair grading is much more important than turnaround times, within reason. Do you disagree?

[BobbyStrawberry]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

I qualified my statement by saying "within reason." 1.5 years (and a friend of mine and I are still waiting on a sub from early 2021) is not within reason.

I agree with that assessment. My point is that, when customers have no idea about turnaround time, there's no way to know whether or not it will be "within reason". Whether SGC's turnaround is 5 days or 5 months, at least it seems like I can trust knowing ahead of time that that's what it will be, unlike PSA.

[bobbyw8469]

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry

Call me impatient, but I find the lack of clear expectations about PSA turnaround times unacceptable. Don't they still have submissions from early 2021 that they haven't finished grading?

Correct....we sent one in around Fed/March of 2021 that didn't get officially entered until May.....still outstanding......outstanding as in, not completed.

[Tyruscobb]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

are people THAT impatient/in need of instant gratification?

Answering this question requires knowing the submitter’s intent. A business/flipper may require a quick turnaround time to maintain cash flow to pay overhead. Cards do not make money sitting in a warehouse at PSA for over a year. However, a PC submitter has the luxury of waiting.

[Frank A]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Accurate and fair, not overly harsh, grading would seem FAR more important than turnaround time as long as that time is within reason. I frankly don't understand the obsession with turnaround time as evidenced by all the duplicative threads on the same topic, are people THAT impatient/in need of instant gratification? To me if a card comes back super fast graded one or two grades low, that's a disaster, not something to celebrate.

Who the hell want's to wait a year before they get their cards back. You could be dead by then. Thats not impatient, that's common sense

[Lorewalker]

Originally Posted by Frank A

Who the hell want's to wait a year before they get their cards back. You could be dead by then. Thats not impatient, that's common sense

Wait times at PSA on recent subs are not going to be anywhere near a year but I get your point. I think if I am submitting for resale I will remain patient. PSA tends to bring more money and until recently they were grading less harshly.

For me neither SGC nor PSA is an option at this present time.