![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Being unfamiliar with the set, were 'all' of these cards hand cut? Or were they issued as individual cards? Either way, your set is complete. It will just be a bit of an annoyance in the back of your mind.
![]()
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
This is a multi-subject strip card set that includes actors and other sports athletes in it, not just baseball players. They were printed and distributed in sheets, and have a playing card theme to them, so they were intended to be cut out so they could literally be treated as a deck of cards. Jimmy Foxx's card was one of the jokers in the set/deck. So yes, all single cards out there are hand cut. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My personal opinion is you can count an individual card by having the sheet. Heck, you have it in original form...to me it's a card which comes on a sheet of cards.
![]() That all said, I am not a set collector so, I will defer to those that do collect them for some kind of unofficial ruling.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 08-19-2022 at 03:36 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
All I know is that Mickey Cochrane needs a new agent. He got played!
Quote:
__________________
Thanks! Brian L Familytoad Ridgefield, WA Hall of Fame collector. Prewar Set collector. Topps Era collector. 1971 Topps Football collector. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1928 W565s in their natural habitat with the Gehrig on the red sheet!!
1927 W560 sheet with the Babe
__________________
Always buying Babe Ruth Cards!!! Last edited by BabyRuth; 08-23-2022 at 05:00 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yay, my new scanner is big enough to fit the sheets!!
Here they are, happy to be able to show these now 1923 W515-2 x2 1928 W513 Complete Set #51-100 Last edited by nineunder71; 08-24-2022 at 09:23 AM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
successful deals with hcv123, rholmes, robw1959, Yankees1964, theuclakid, Brian Van Horn, h2oya311, thecapeleague, Gkoz316, chesbro41, edjs, wazoo, becollie, t206kid, vintageismygame, Neal, bradmar48, iconsportscards, wrapperguy, agrebene, T3fan, T3s, ccre, Leon, wolf441, cammb, tonyo, markf31,gonzo,scmavl & others currently working on: E101 (33/50) T3 set (104/104), complete! T205 set (108/221) '33 Goudey collecting W600s, Walter Johnson |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I vote complete. I have something similar with my 1951 Berk Ross set. I have all the baseball players as individual cards except for a 2-card panel of Joe DiMaggio and Granny Hamner. I have the Hamner as a separate card as well, but the panel is the only DiMaggio I have, but I consider my set to be complete.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your set is complete….. your Foxx card just has gigantic margins!!!!
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Question for Negative Collectors | Jobu | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-10-2017 09:49 PM |
a question for the old time collectors | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 12-04-2008 04:56 PM |
Question for the T-206 set collectors | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 02-03-2007 10:51 AM |
A Question For The T206 Collectors | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 01-25-2003 08:14 PM |
Question for collectors | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 02-10-2002 04:41 PM |