![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
And graded completely abandoning their own written grade definitions and all the while implementing more harsh standards to the average collector's submissions.
Makes zero sense to me.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I think it makes cents ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Now who do you suppose made SGC overgrade such a high profile card?
![]()
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
another example that grading sucks
__________________
[FONT="Lucida Sans Unicode"]CampyFan39 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Again THOSE 4.5 and 5.5s 50/50 t/b
The Wagner isnt even close
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The beautiful sweet scent of manure, wafting through the SGC grading facilities.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Piled high and deep.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The new cert numbers on SGC are a different number structure than the old. I have reholdered many cards and they do not re-use the older format certs, they create a new one and it gets entered as being graded the day it was reholdered. There is a 60/5 listed in the old SGC pop and a new 5 listed in the new report. I'm guessing this is just a legacy reholder. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
You can view the Pop grades in either the old format or the new format. Either way, they have graded 18 Honus Wagners (1 Piedmont, and 17 Sweet Cap) and only one is a 5. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Here's another SGC Wagner that changed holders and cert numbers. 11b.jpg 11c.jpg |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Where can one view the old pop report?
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
At the top of the page it says show it says show old grading yes or no and the default is no so you have to change that to yes.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As previously mentioned, doesn't changing it to old grading, just change the way the grade is displayed? It doesn't seem to matter if you are viewing the old or the new grade. The pop report remains the same--they have graded 18 Honus Wagners.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My first thought was also that those are some worn corners for a 5. BUT, if literally everything else about the card is damn nice I don’t think it’s unreasonable.
__________________
~20 SUCCESSFUL BST (1 trade) on Net54 |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone need a T206 Honus Wagner? | WWG | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 05-07-2018 09:09 PM |
1909-11 T206 Honus Wagner vs. 1911-16 Kotton Honus Wagner: Who Has More? | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 08-29-2010 04:30 PM |
Honus Wagner T206 | swschultz | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 07-22-2010 07:22 PM |
T206 Honus Wagner PSA 8 | ichieh | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 06-09-2010 07:02 PM |
WTB: T206 Honus Wagner | mintacular | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 5 | 05-04-2010 12:05 PM |