![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It’s ok Justin. I am used to getting picked on. Bob does it all the time. 🥹
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This thread needs an image:
![]() Lemme take a slightly different approach to start and evaluate the card from an aesthetic standpoint. On the positive side: --It's large --Has a nice team logo --Has a facsimile autograph --Has clean uncluttered graphics (I hate cards where all the exploding crap all over the borders intrudes into the card image). --has borders (not a fan of full bleed) --Has a nice blue background that trends towards aqua (admittedly, I am biased since blue is my favorite color) and has a pop-art feel to it --looks like Mantle (I know this is a subject of debate but absent a caption I would know it is him, so it passes muster with me) --Flexichrome (I happen to like them) --Stats on the back for the past year and lifetime --Vitals on the back --A nice write-up courtesy of Mr. Berger On the negative side: --The yellow bat color is odd --The foreshortening needed to render the face accurately lacks the sharp lines differentiating the jaw. Would I have preferred a nice 3/4 portrait? Sure. Aesthetically, overall, I find it to be a pleasing rendering and card. Not as nice as the 1954 Topps set that I have always preferred, but better than average design for the era. Now, let's talk reality on the iconic nature of the card. This has been THE postwar card since I was a kid collector in the late 1970s. That's a 40+ year run. Unless there is a realignment of collectors that I simply do not see happening in my lifetime, this card is going to remain THE postwar card. Newbie collectors and even non-collectors are geeked on this card. That doesn't happen with more than a handful of cards. Now, the Dread Pirate Roberts--investor--view. The 1952 Mantle has been on a steady growth trend for decades. Look at the components of the DJIA in 1980 and compare them to what makes up the average now. Lots of dead or deleted companies. I am not worried that the Mantle will be worthless in 20 years. I am worried that I will be priced out of owning one in the next few years.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 07-18-2022 at 11:42 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle | Donscards | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-02-2021 09:03 AM |
1952 Topps Mickey Mantle PSA 3 Available in Complete 1952 Topps Set Break at National | JustCollectVP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 104 | 11-24-2016 03:32 AM |
1952 Topps Mickey Mantle SGC 20 | sycks22 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 06-12-2015 03:20 PM |
FS: 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle vg+ | t206whiteborders | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 01-02-2014 05:12 PM |
F/S 1952 Topps #311 Mickey Mantle PSA 3 VG | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-08-2009 10:08 PM |