![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Too bad you didn't ask these questions (and "wonder even more") before you bid on (and won) the item.
Last edited by doug.goodman; 07-17-2022 at 06:17 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm just looking for answer to the question: in your experience, have you found that PSA rarely, sometimes or often got back (and maybe other info) wrong in its certification records? Or do very few people even check on that when they bid on or buy a PSA card?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The question here is why the database reports ANY back for a card from this era of grading, since the flip does not identify the back and from the surrounding certs, the backs of the cards submitted with this one weren't recorded in the database either. That's what you need to find out. Good luck. Why you are resisting a simple communication with PSA is beyond me.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 07-17-2022 at 06:59 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Have now contacted PSA.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This comes up correctly when I search it. Are you sure you entered it correctly?
Last edited by glynparson; 07-18-2022 at 07:32 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Oh I see it’s not a sovereign but says sovereign. I think it somehow got updated from a listing and the incorrect info got added as fact. Wh
Just a guess. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Glyn, why would it get updated (and if so, incorrectly)? It still says Sovereign, not Piedmont. And a previous reply is incorrect: There are in fact a couple of other HOF t206s with certified numbers just before this one that do include back info. Others do not. Inconsistent, but some others do have it in same time frame. I still don't see how and why it should be listed as Sovereign unless 1) card was swapped out later for same card in Piedmont (which also appears a bit short)....or 2) just human error, but if so how often has anyone seen such?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg, not sure if this helps but I have a Piedmont 150 Matty that too had an early flip; It now resides in a SGC holder. After reading this thread, I ran a search on the old PSA cert number and it too came up as an Sovereign. Also notice how "short" it looks in the holder; it does the same in the now SGC holder in which they graded as a 2 also. Hopefully this relieves your worries...
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Something about the title and the card doesn't match. | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-29-2021 11:37 AM |
Notice from PSA Management about a certification number | russkcpa | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 40 | 01-07-2021 02:31 PM |
When a card doesn't fit PSA holder.... | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 07-09-2015 09:38 AM |
The ball being auctioned doesn't even match the ball pictured on the LOA | markf31 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 08-25-2012 02:04 PM |
PSA Certification Number Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-04-2006 04:38 AM |