![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For my '54 set, I have 98% of my cards in PSA holders and from here on out it'll be PSA only for any 50's builds.
I worked in a movie theater as my first real job back in high school and when the early pokemon movies came out they gave out cards the opening weekend. I don't know why but I grabbed a handful from each movie, held on to them for the last 20 years and low and behold they have some serious value now. Not sure who I'll send them to but CSG seems to be growing market share on these so I may try them. Their grading system seems to be very strict which I prefer. Personally prefer PSA for post-war vintage but those new SGC slabs are quite nice and they are getting tougher on their grading finally. I'd stay away from old label SCG post war cards, they are over graded by 1-1.5. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Being based in the UK submitting raw cards for grading is just too big a pain, but I do buy graded cards from time to time. Any of the big 4 are welcome in my collection.
Because I'm buying for my PC, the card is the most important thing for me - not the holder. That means I can pick up relative bargains in SGC, BVG or CSA holders Given a choice though, I have a preference for SGC especially for Pre-1970.
__________________
Working on the following sets: 1916 and 1917 Zeenut, 1954B, 1955B, 1971T and 1972T |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My pre-war are mostly SGC, and post-war are a mix of SGC/PSA up until the 1980's, then it's all PSA from there on out. I have a handful of BGS, but nothing major. I really like the new SGC slabs, they look super sharp with a lot of cards and I'm very impressed with their customer service. PSA is pretty classic and is great for resale, but I with the majority of people here in that I don't typically tend to resell unless I have to or something better catches my eye. If we are talking pre-1980 then I don't really care if it's PSA or SGC, whatever has the nicer card for the best price, the inconsistencies in looks of the slabs don't bother me.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I suppose it's fair to say I have a love-hate relationship with grading over the past 5 years or so. I love a properly graded card in a clean slab, but I hate issues / errors in the grading process and scratched, dirty slabs. If I like the slab once I get it in hand (50% chance?) I will leave the card slabbed, but I've busted dozens upon dozens of them in the recent past too.
Anymore grading is very much just an option for me, certainly not a hard requirment. I like to buy graded online if I cannot evaluate the card in hand first, just to make sure I'm in the ballpark with expectations once the card arrives - and especially if it's over like $100 in value. I will usually stick with PSA and SGC when buying online. I've submitted on rare occasions in the past, but only to SGC - I've never met the patience criteria for PSA turn times or really agreed with their pricing. I will say even with SGC, the rampant inconsistency lately is just a huge turnoff for me - they recently graded the same '65 Mantle both a 5 and then a 6.5 a few months apart. Anymore I really just prefer to buy raw vintage at the LCS. I learned to grade almost 30 years ago. The allure of the "official" holder in light of how many mistakes even the reputable graders still make I guess has just mostly worn off for me.
__________________
Prewar Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 06-09-2022 at 10:52 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I listened to a podcast the other day where they presented statistics on a study where they resubmitted the same cards to the same companies multiple times. 45% of the time the card came back as a higher grade. The results of the study put a really bad taste in my mouth for grading. I recently received my first ever round of grading back from SGC and I got hammered. Every one of the cards came back 1-2 grades lower than I expected. Really disappointed. All raw for me from now on except the big cards or grade sensitive cards. Grading feels way overused and mostly not necessary in the under $300 world that I play in. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yep. Even 3 decades into professional grading, so much of the actual service remains a gimmick. A scale that at the end of the day is tied to eye appeal can never be anything more than subjective, no matter how much they try to convince us otherwise. In the mostly midgrade vintage world I play in, I could submit the same "EX" raw card 10 times, and sometimes it would get a 5, sometimes it would get a 6, and sometimes it might get a 4. There might be the outlier where it gets a 3 or a 1 because of something a grader thought they saw only under magnification. Bottom line - you know the "range" of your raw cards and which ones are nicer than others, and even with the nicer ones what their micro flaws might be. These things don't change. But if you play the slab game, the grade can and often will. I'm just at a point in my collecting career where I would rather focus on the card only and appreciate it for what it is. This is why I don't sweat grading anymore. For protection if I buy graded online, I don't focus on the grade. I have some 5's nicer than other 6's, and some 6's that look better than 7's. It's just the reality of how the game works in practice.
__________________
Prewar Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 06-14-2022 at 08:19 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why grading companies go under | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 12-24-2018 08:42 AM |
How are the grading companies doing? | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 01-26-2015 08:24 AM |
Before PSA and grading companies | 1952boyntoncollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-11-2014 05:56 PM |
Grading Companies | Ben Yourg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 02-04-2010 10:38 AM |
What if grading companies could do this??????? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 11-20-2007 09:17 PM |