![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've found this not just for photos but for other types of memorabilia too.
It's frustrating because these people are keeping items from true collectors. First they've done it by buying something at an AH when they clearly have no desire to own it. Secondly, when create their ridiculous eBay listings it won't get bought by a collector. Eventually these numpty's will run out of cash and it'll come to the market a reasonable price when they need to sell.
__________________
Working on the following sets: 1916 and 1917 Zeenut, 1954B, 1955B, 1971T and 1972T |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The flippers are jackals, but they die off quickly when the market turns. What will be really interesting is what happens when the later Baby Boomers who were really into this hobby for a lifetime start dying or downsizing.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For me photos are tough. Ones that look similar by year or content can be the same type (ie Type 1) and such big price differences. So with lack of experience and knowledge I am a little gun shy getting into them
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1920s Advertising Card Babe Ruth/Carl Mays All Stars Throwing Pose 1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards Rare early Joe Jackson Cards and Postcards 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Those guys mostly don't know what they are looking at either, Jeff. They rely on image quality and printing and attribution notations. With big money coming in, definitely an issue how photos are dated. I mean, a thief might not bother to forge a press release slug, or press and printing notes on the back of a $20 photo, but on a $2,000 photo, yeah, that tracks. The other issue is that some of the 'best' photos are not Type I as PSA defines it. PSA says Type I are the best. Team issues are Type III:
![]() I'd rather have a 1960 team issue Chamberlain than a random original photo from the same era. What is the scourge right now are the scanned and printed fakes on eBay. I've bought a few of those on eBay. Run a search for a vintage photo subject in sports and you will come up with tons of cheap knock-offs. The good news is that they are obvious in hand and from the price. The bad news is that when they are sold as originals you have to get them in hand. The worse news is that those doofuses who buy them thinking they are genuine and don't know better then drip them into the resale market so that even if the maker discloses he printed it the next seller puts it out as an original.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 06-09-2022 at 08:10 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Insane signings prices at the Sun Times show | isaac2004 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 80 | 11-04-2012 07:47 PM |
Insane Prices | t206hof | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 10-30-2010 02:36 PM |
insane prices for w517 strip cards | dennis | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-29-2009 06:08 AM |
insane E-card prices again? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 08-25-2008 12:58 PM |
Insane Caramel Prices | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 06-08-2006 03:51 PM |