How many to a series? Let's see some 1955 Bowman miscuts and uncut material

[G1911]

#40 Wertz with a 65+ card below and to the right.

And then one with a blue and black bottom

[G1911]

222 Kemmerer with a 1-64 left

223 Jeffcoat with a 1-64 left.

[G1911]

221 Brown with 1-64 left.

224 Fondy with 1-64 left.

Not all examples of these cards I'm showing with extra border on the left show a blonde border card; many of them show what is another 65+ dark wood card.

[G1911]

218 Adcock, 219 Lockman, 220 Hearn all with the 1-64 border at left. Presumably a strip of cards in numerical order above a row with the 1-64 wood, at least some of the time.

[G1911]

These panels are the only uncut material I know: https://bid.robertedwardauctions.com...e?itemid=47109

Certainly supports skip numbering, and that not even all the highs are highs.

[Zach Wheat]

Interesting. I can dig out the Baker card if you need a better scan, if I still have it. I gave a bunch of my '55 Bowman duplicates to another board member.

[Volod]

Originally Posted by G1911

These panels are the only uncut material I know: https://bid.robertedwardauctions.com...e?itemid=47109

Certainly supports skip numbering, and that not even all the highs are highs.

Here is an article by Bob Lemke, published in the Oct. 1985 issue of Baseball Cards Magazine. On page 3 is another uncut sheet that may be of interest. The other pages are also interesting for collectors of the set.

[G1911]

Thank you gents, 7 Baker can be added to the list.

Interesting Lemke apparently had it figured out. That fits with the evidence of the miscuts; odd this doesn't seem to have been brought up anywhere public in almost 40 years. I guess we're now looking to see these sheets for the final proof that this is indeed the case. It's a huge sheet if this is the case, especially for Bowman.