NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-12-2022, 01:52 PM
nolemmings's Avatar
nolemmings nolemmings is online now
Todd Schultz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldjudge View Post
For a common card like that it would end my interest in it. There will be plenty more opportunities to find an undamaged copy. For a scarce/rare card I have no issue with some paper loss, as long as it is on the back. I consider that amount of paper loss as somewhere between small and moderate.
I would agree with Jay. The paper loss attributed to tape removal is at least moderate IMO and in a prominent place (I consider the paper loss and tape stain to be one defect). I would pass, absent a really good deal, and even then, would likely just hold it for resale.
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal
Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable

If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-12-2022, 02:35 PM
profholt82's Avatar
profholt82 profholt82 is offline
Adam
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 229
Default

Beautiful 2.5. For important cards like that, issues on the backs do not bother me. I would definitely buy that Clemente with no reservations.

Along these same lines, I purchased a 51B Mantle a while back that is an SGC 2. The front is well centered and presents very well, much better than a 2 in my opinion, but the back has some wax/gum staining and a similar amount of paper loss as your Clemente. I'm quite happy with it. For important vintage cards like that, it's all about presentation for me. The backs are not nearly as important.

Last edited by profholt82; 04-12-2022 at 02:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-14-2022, 01:56 PM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 35,662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by profholt82 View Post
Beautiful 2.5. For important cards like that, issues on the backs do not bother me. I would definitely buy that Clemente with no reservations.

Along these same lines, I purchased a 51B Mantle a while back that is an SGC 2. The front is well centered and presents very well, much better than a 2 in my opinion, but the back has some wax/gum staining and a similar amount of paper loss as your Clemente. I'm quite happy with it. For important vintage cards like that, it's all about presentation for me. The backs are not nearly as important.
I completely agree about blank backs. I love writing and damage on them as they generally sell for a lot less and look the same to me.

Even this amount of damage to the back border doesn't bother me, knowing I paid a low price for it, relative to it's eye appeal. There are almost an infinite number of ways to collect.
.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg wallace.jpg (178.3 KB, 67 views)
__________________
Leon Luckey
www.luckeycards.com

Last edited by Leon; 04-14-2022 at 01:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PSA and Paper Loss here2havefun Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 9 12-23-2020 01:46 PM
Did SGC miss the paper loss? sportscardpete Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 15 10-20-2012 11:28 PM
PSA 5 with paper loss? Runscott Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 52 01-05-2012 06:34 PM
fixing paper loss...or not Archive Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 2 09-18-2007 05:17 PM
paper loss Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 13 01-30-2006 02:09 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:12 AM.


ebay GSB