|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
2. I would characterize the paper loss as moderate. It's large enough to be a distraction, and very noticeable.
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (136/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (198/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Agree, the paper loss is definitely moderate.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
While the premium if graded a psa1 would certainly be great, the premium over a 2.5 would not be the same percentage. Suffice it to say, if it was cracked out "hoping for a better grade" likely it would come back lower. This would cause some to say its over graded, however the eye appeal is strong with this one.
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors Last edited by Republicaninmass; 04-12-2022 at 07:29 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA and Paper Loss | here2havefun | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 12-23-2020 02:46 PM |
| Did SGC miss the paper loss? | sportscardpete | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 10-21-2012 12:28 AM |
| PSA 5 with paper loss? | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 52 | 01-05-2012 07:34 PM |
| fixing paper loss...or not | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 09-18-2007 06:17 PM |
| paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-30-2006 03:09 AM |