![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The increment should be a penny.
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree with the replies that in the end each item is going to sell for whatever the most interested person is willing to pay, despite the bid increments.
Personally, as almost exclusively a buyer (and of low-pop things infrequently available), I'm perfectly happy if the bid increments are enormous, so as to dissuade other bidders from even bothering to be in the way of something I want. This would support the thesis of the comments about lower increments increasing action, and be the opposite of OPs suggestion that small increments are good for the buyer---depends on whether a buyer's primary interest is the lowest possible cost, or increasing the odds of definitely being the ultimate winner. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Auction House Buyer's Premiums | T206Collector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 06-03-2018 06:53 PM |
Auction bid increments | Snapolit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 10-08-2016 07:46 AM |
Auction Sites With No Buyer's Fee | The Nasty Nati | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-30-2014 07:36 PM |
1955 Ashland auction--Huggins and Scott Auction | booyahlaw | Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum | 1 | 05-26-2010 08:19 PM |
What is the rationale behind a buyer's premium on an auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 11-29-2006 10:09 PM |