|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi Bill. Nice cards! Just my opinion of course, but all of those grades given by Sgc look pretty accurate to me.
And who says they got the Collins right the first time you'd sent it in. I've seen many 1's in both Psa and Sgc slabs that display like that Collins. Those are my thoughts at first glance.
__________________
Tony A. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
BTW, looked at your Portrait collection and my jaw dropped. What a great array of cards, just beautiful! Slowly I hope to upgrade mine as things go along. Bill
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------- My Cards - https://www.flickr.com/photos/192293172@N05/albums |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks Bill, much appreciated!
At times I feel collectors like us could probably grade more consistent than any of these third party dudes.
__________________
Tony A. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I had a small 2 card that was received on March 15th and graded March 30th. I knew they wouldn't grade high but am happy with the quick turnaround as I just wanted them slabbed.
![]()
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here are a couple of my recently acquired tuxedos.
Last edited by Snowman; 04-04-2022 at 01:30 AM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Most buyers believe SGC graded cards sell nearly half price versus PSA. As both a collector an seller, I'm still not brain washed, although many buyers are.
IMO those cards for your collections in SGC holders are beautiful! Last edited by Directly; 04-04-2022 at 05:39 AM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Ya, when I saw this one up for auction, the price didn't even matter. I was determined to win it at almost any cost just because of how rare it is to see a card like this slabbed in a 2.5 holder. The reason for the grade is paper loss on the back. Which reminds me... I seem to recall seeing a thread somewhere around here where people were discussing the highest possible grade a card could receive if it has paper loss on back, but I couldn't find it. If anyone knows which thread I'm referring to, please let me know. I think this is probably on the upper end of that expectation for cards with paper loss. Here's the back of the Elgin Baylor RC. Last edited by Snowman; 04-04-2022 at 08:57 PM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Knowing the 1961 set well, that is the nicest 2.5 Elgin RC you could ever wish for. I suspect the back has that gum stain or residue that is very difficult to remove!
Sweet card! Wow~ Peace, Mike |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree, that seems like a pretty harsh grade on the Baylor card. But is that a bit of paper loss on his face?
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Head scratcher. Should be (expected) an 8. This one going up for sale. Always loved the 1964 Brock.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Big PSA Reveal | parkplace33 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 07-01-2021 11:44 AM |
| Huge mail day! - finally the BIG REVEAL! | bounce | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 08-16-2020 01:39 PM |
| Hunt's Hobby Reveal Dec 11 2018 | ruth-gehrig | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 44 | 12-12-2018 12:56 PM |
| Original 12-card horizontal E91 strip may reveal 1909 printing format | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 67 | 05-01-2015 07:06 PM |
| Reveal Ebay Handles?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 137 | 01-15-2007 11:33 AM |