Heritage & PWCC and the PSA 9 Mays

[Pat R]

What is described as scratches looks like paper fibers to me.

[Peter_Spaeth]

The surprise to me is that a buyer at that level actually cares what's beneath the flip.

[Jcosta19]

Originally Posted by Pat R

What is described as scratches looks like paper fibers to me.

Also they seem plainly visible in the Heritage scans.

1952 Berk Ross Willie Mays PSA Mint 9 - None Higher.... https://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball-c.../50049-56488.s

Sent from my SM-G781V using Tapatalk

[cgjackson222]

Originally Posted by Jcosta19

Also they seem plainly visible in the Heritage scans.

1952 Berk Ross Willie Mays PSA Mint 9 - None Higher.... https://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball-c.../50049-56488.s

Sent from my SM-G781V using Tapatalk

Agreed. I am unclear as to how he only noticed them in the PWCC scans, and not in the Heritage scans.

So has the buyer ever seen the card in person yet? If not, it seems a bit odd to get this worked up about something he's never held in his own hands. I agree that the imperfections may be paper fibers that somehow got encapsulated along with the card, rather than imperfections on the card itself. But one would probably have to see it in person to confirm.

[steve B]

The sheer number of typos made it nearly unreadable. But it was funny in parts. Willie "Mace" .... who I haven't heard of, but have to think had a unique style of baserunning.
Or playing "how many different ways can you spell the same guys name"

But I think someone at pwcc should have had a look when he complained to see if that was just stuff on the scanner or slabbed along with the card.

Or better still, they guy should have gotten the card himself and looked at it.

[Fuddjcal]

Originally Posted by Pat R

What is described as scratches looks like paper fibers to me.

couldn't the scratches also be on the Fake PSA case?