![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would be surprised at anyone selling this card raw unless they expected it would only grade authentic and not get a numerical grade and 1/16" short in both directions is very suspect IMO.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The seller has sold a bunch of raw A&Gs, including a Clarkson, for what that’s worth. Most of them, including the Keefe, have minor paper loss on the back. Seems consistent with breaking up a scrapbook collection. Not sure if that changes anything in your thoughts.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Even if you get an A its an awesome card.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Only one of my A&Gs is raw, but it's also thick and sturdy. So assuming that mine is authentic (and I'm pretty sure it is), that wouldn't worry me.
My raw card measures right. FWIW, I tried to measure a slabbed A&G (that has a numerical grade) and it looks like it's a bit short, but who knows with all that plastic in the way. Last edited by nat; 03-09-2022 at 08:39 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks! I’m not a graded-card guy, so this one will be staying raw. I’m mostly asking out of curiosity, because I don’t think I’ll send it back. It’s an absolutely beautiful looking card on the front (and the back is nice except for the couple small paper loss areas). I think I can be happy with it even knowing in the back of my mind it might be trimmed.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
From the small pick it appears genuine
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have one, Comiskey. If we're saying that precision cards were the norm in the 1880s, then yes, mine too is trimmed. Again, who f-ing cares? All mine are raw, and I am keeping them that way. Enjoy your cards as a hobby, not as an OCD investment worrying about insignificant BS minutiae.
__________________
James Ingram Successful net54 purchases from/trades with: Tere1071 (twice), Bocabirdman (5 times), 8thEastVB, GoldenAge50s, IronHorse2130, Kris19 (twice), G1911, dacubfan, sflayank, Smanzari, bocca001, eliminator, ejstel, lampertb, rjackson44 (twice), Jason19th, Cmvorce, CobbSpikedMe, Harliduck, donmuth, HercDriver, Huck, theshleps, horzverti, ALBB, lrush |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't see anything wrong with it. Many, many 19th century cards are still raw - probably way more than are encapsulated - and that doesn't mean they are all altered. Not everyone sends their cards to a TPG. Buy the card, not the holder.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trimmed? | BruceinGa | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 05-01-2015 03:02 PM |
1914 Cracker Jack - Trimmed or not Trimmed? | ajjohnsonsoxfan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 07-17-2014 07:44 PM |
Would you be able to detect a trimmed T206 card that was, as trimmed, properly sized? | esquiresports | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 04-12-2013 10:52 AM |
For Trade: Two trimmed (I mean really trimmed) EPDG - SOLD | t206hound | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 02-27-2013 09:28 AM |
(1) Trimmed T205 and (1) Trimmed T206 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-21-2008 11:54 AM |