![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
SGC and PSA having hi res scans after the cards are encapsulated is probably not the technology they rely on to identify previously submitted cards. In PSA's case they might be using the faulty genamint technology which is scanning, in the early stages of grading, attributes of the card to identify if a card was previously submitted. I don't think SGC has technology that they use in that capacity.
Since all steps of submitting rely heavily on technology I suspect it would be easy for a grader to access prior submissions to see if by chance the submitter is sending in the same card again but seems like a waste of time. PSA would be able to id the card as a previous submission based on the genamint scan much easier than SGC could.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
SGC identify with a high res photo? I call BS. That would only be obtainable with adequately working AI software which they positively do not have or we all would hear they finally got it all to work. I know through a recent Minneapolis card shops submission to SGC that SGC don't know sh!t about what card is what. Third time through, Prizm Joe Burrow RC Auto #ed. Took three times to finally get the 10/10 he wanted. Should have just went with PSA for this card honestly. Now if they had an inkling of an idea of how to use advanced software, or in this case just read the #ed part, this would have been a rejection 2x's. Since it was not rejected any of the three times(9.5/10, 10/9.5, 10/10) then there is ample proof they have no AI nor the care to do simple research. How can you miss the same # three times?
Now if SGC wants to come on the board and say they do have this software and it works great then I will let the shop know and they can pursue reimbursement. If TPG's are gathering copies of the cards without the knowledge of the owners I would be a little pissed off about that. I mean if I sent it in for this type of service then great. If I never knew about it then I would be pissed. Its not part of the service or of any added value to me so do not be handling my card in additional manners that could potentially cause further deterioration from finger nails, oils, dirt's, or residues outside of the holder I sent it in and the one its going in. They don't stand behind their guarantees if the cards get damaged and try to screw the owners on replacement values when it does. Honestly why do we deal with this over and over? It all about them Benjies ![]()
__________________
Andrew Member since 2009 |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2021/2022 Junior Jazz Cards | BaltOrioles | Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum | 0 | 01-29-2022 06:15 PM |
Article: 2022 Hall of Fame Ballot (and cards) | Mike D. | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 0 | 12-04-2021 06:55 PM |
The ethics of cracking certified cards | Brianruns10 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 21 | 04-23-2020 01:51 PM |
Cracking out BVG cards | irv | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 08-13-2017 05:56 AM |
Cracking out graded cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-23-2003 06:04 PM |