 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
03-01-2022, 03:42 PM
|
||||
|
||||
SGC and PSA having hi res scans after the cards are encapsulated is probably not the technology they rely on to identify previously submitted cards. In PSA's case they might be using the faulty genamint technology which is scanning, in the early stages of grading, attributes of the card to identify if a card was previously submitted. I don't think SGC has technology that they use in that capacity.
Since all steps of submitting rely heavily on technology I suspect it would be easy for a grader to access prior submissions to see if by chance the submitter is sending in the same card again but seems like a waste of time. PSA would be able to id the card as a previous submission based on the genamint scan much easier than SGC could.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2021/2022 Junior Jazz Cards | BaltOrioles | Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum | 0 | 01-29-2022 06:15 PM |
| Article: 2022 Hall of Fame Ballot (and cards) | Mike D. | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 0 | 12-04-2021 06:55 PM |
| The ethics of cracking certified cards | Brianruns10 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 21 | 04-23-2020 01:51 PM |
| Cracking out BVG cards | irv | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 08-13-2017 05:56 AM |
| Cracking out graded cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-23-2003 06:04 PM |
Threaded Mode