![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IMO Single stupidest auction....I've ever seen.
Guessing these cards will appear ( back?) On the collectable app. As the fine print shows they were a sponsor of the auction. Lelands, since the passing of Josh Evans, had gone down him and gaining speed.
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Completely agree with the part in bold. Both the quality and quantity of offerings have already dropped off considerably.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not super familiar with the particulars of this auction, but I do think that the last couple of years has shaken up the market in ways that will have a ripple effect for a long time.
It's hard (for me at least) to know what is going on. Which prices went up as a result of legitimate entry of new money into the market and what is driven by other factors. Of course, when funds get involved, the way that they operate could mean that at any point, one (or more) could decide that cards are not a great vehicle for storing and growing wealth, and many items can quickly reenter the market. Of course, there was likely a decent amount of "pump-and-dump" going on as well. Certain markets, like the ticket market, seem to be maintaining many of the increases to this point. The card market has definitely seen some settling on prices. Many of the major auction houses have shifted for 2-4 auctions a year to monthly auctions, which I don't think will benefit the hobby in the long run. It means less impressive and interesting auctions, a focus on cards over other collectibles (which is fine for some but leaves segments of the hobby out) since cards are super easy photograph, catalog and describe very quickly. I haven't sent anything to an auction house in a couple of years but I wonder what the explosion of auctions has done for fees to the auction house... has the competition to add items meant the houses are willing to be more generous with consignors? Interesting times. I'm glad that in general my collecting areas are obscure enough that they are not part of this whole rollercoaster. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe the MAXX guy bought it with his customers' money and had to cash in.
Just because people have money doesn't mean they are smart about what to do with it. I know a lot of people that if they get $1 million they have to spend $999,000 of it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How did you do in the Leland's Auction | OldOriole | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-30-2017 05:43 PM |
Leland's Strange Lot Results or Software Bug? | danmckee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 01-19-2015 10:23 PM |
LELAND RESULTS - how'd everyone do? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 12-21-2006 12:02 PM |
Leland's Results | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 06-25-2005 05:00 PM |
Leland's Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-13-2003 12:29 PM |