NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-26-2022, 10:22 PM
G1911 G1911 is offline
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,419
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobC View Post
It is not really a matter of guilt, just proper reporting for tax purposes. And no, things like garage sales are NOT going to suddenly be stalked by IRS and state tax agents, nor are they going to accept and act on calls from people reporting those having garage sales. Garage sales are what are considered as "casual sales" and are generally not subject to income or sales tax laws. By their nature, they are considered to not be indicative of an ongoing business operation, and therefore don't need to be reported or monitored. In the past, the thresholds for things like 1099-K reporting were considered the point when one went from not operating a business to now operating a business, but there never had been a truly defined point that marked when someone's true intent was to operate as a business, and that has not changed..

Ebay is only the platform for these sales, and the new 1099-K reporting threshold isn't being imposed on Ebay, just those third-party payment services like Paypal, Venmo, or Zelle. Only Ebay sales using payment services like these get included in 1099-K reporting, not sales using checks, MOs, or credit cards. It is all about the government having access to your records if they want/need to go checking you out. It wasn't suddenly saying anyone doing $600 or more in casual sales is now considered to be in a viable, ongoing business.

And the $600 threshold goes hand in hand with the reporting threshold for non-employee, independent contractor, compensation, which has been at $600 for decades. That used to be reported on 1099-MISC forms until recently when they broke out such reporting a few years ago on the new 1099-NEC forms.

Anyway, the new 1099-K reporting is tied into the same reason that 1099-NEC forms do not have to be issued to people/businesses that operate as corporations. If you hire Joe Blow to plow your driveway, and cut him a check in payment, as an individual he can go to his bank and simply endorse and cash the check and walk out with his money. That cashed check never shows up in Joe Blow's bank account records or activities, or on his bank statement. However, if he incorporated his snow plowing business, you'd maybe make the check out to Joe Blow, Inc. In that case, if he takes it to his bank and endorses the check, under banking laws and regulations they can't just give him the money. He actually has to deposit that check into the corporation's bank account first, and can then write a check to himself personally, or otherwise transfer the money to himself. Regardless of what he does, that deposit will now show up in his corporate bank account records and on the corporate bank account statement. The IRS can then come in whenever they want and demand to see the corporate bank account records, and simply see the deposit and question if it was reportable income for tax purposes. And that is why a 1099-MISC or -NEC isn't required to be sent to a corporation, regardless of how much more over $600 someone may have paid a corporation for their services in any given year.

Well, when it comes to Paypal (and I assume similarly for other payment services like Zelle or Venmo), you generally have your account linked to an actual bank account you can draw money out of to then make payments through Paypal. But if someone sends you money through Paypal, it doesn't necessarily get deposited into your bank account. It sits in your Paypal account till you can have it transferred into your bank account, or use it to make Paypal payments to others. And as long as you never formally deposit anything back into your bank account, it also never shows up up on/in your bank account's records or statements, which the IRS can demand to see. It is similar to an individual non-employee getting paid by a check, but just cashing it at their bank instead of depositing it into their bank account, and thereby not create a traceable record of it in their name that the IRS can easily find. So to get after this potentially hidden income/business activity, they've taken to imposing this same $600 reporting threshold on third-party payment activity, like through Paypal.

Unfortunately in doing so, this reporting doesn't indicate whether you are operating an actual business, or just clearing out stuff from a garage or attic. I imagine the IRS' stance for anyone receiving these 1099-K forms after the lowering of the reporting threshold in 2022 will be that recipients are formally in an ongoing business, unless they report and show otherwise on their tax returns. And this distinction can be very important to someone who is not a card dealer, but a collector or investor instead, who maybe only sells thing occasionally to fund other purchases, or maybe to cash in when when a particular card/item suddenly jumps in value out in the marketplace. The reporting differences can be great, and I've already gone over them in more detail in other threads/posts of mine you can go look up. Suffice it to say here that I believe the biggest differences between reporting as a dealer versus reporting as a collector or investor, are whether your net profits from card sales are treated as ordinary or capital gain income, and whether or not those net profits may also be subject to self-employment tax.

Bottom line is, if you get one of these 1099-K forms, do not just ignore it. And if you try doing your taxes yourself after getting one of these 1099-K forms for the first time, and really don't know what you're doing and/or what I'm talking about, do yourself a big favor and at least seek out the advice and help from a qualified tax professional. Even if it ends up costing you some fees, chances are it will save you much more in time, expense, and aggravation over the long run.
I think you may have replied to the wrong person, as I didn't talk about garage sales at all, or most of what you are talking about. I know how PayPal works...

Garage sales and face to face absolutely are affected though - I don't have proof of what I paid (and thus, to calculate my profit form an eBay sale) from a face to face transaction 20 years ago, or often even memory of what it was myself. As I am taxed on PROFIT, it's going to be a total pain in the ass at best to survive auditing, as I can't prove what I paid at a Card Show 15 years ago to then calculate from an eBay sale next month.

As to your last paragraph, If I have to hire a professional to make sure I don't get !@#$% by the state over a few eBay sales that I wasn't cheating about on my taxes in the first place, well.... That's exactly why this is a problem and ridiculous. It is a shift of the burden of the proof, and creates a ton of headaches. After losing 45%+ of my sale price when I can't show what I originally paid, and then hiring a professional, there's even less reason to sell. Its not much more profitable than burning my duplicates in the fireplace.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-27-2022, 12:06 AM
BobC BobC is offline
Bob C.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,276
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911 View Post
I think you may have replied to the wrong person, as I didn't talk about garage sales at all, or most of what you are talking about. I know how PayPal works...

Garage sales and face to face absolutely are affected though - I don't have proof of what I paid (and thus, to calculate my profit form an eBay sale) from a face to face transaction 20 years ago, or often even memory of what it was myself. As I am taxed on PROFIT, it's going to be a total pain in the ass at best to survive auditing, as I can't prove what I paid at a Card Show 15 years ago to then calculate from an eBay sale next month.

As to your last paragraph, If I have to hire a professional to make sure I don't get !@#$% by the state over a few eBay sales that I wasn't cheating about on my taxes in the first place, well.... That's exactly why this is a problem and ridiculous. It is a shift of the burden of the proof, and creates a ton of headaches. After losing 45%+ of my sale price when I can't show what I originally paid, and then hiring a professional, there's even less reason to sell. Its not much more profitable than burning my duplicates in the fireplace.
My apologies as I wasn't so much responding just to you, but also trying to explain the what's and why's of a lot of these crazy new laws and changes to everyone that may not know much about all this, or have not heard about it already.

And as to saying everyone has to hire a tax professional to do their taxes now, I'm really not suggesting that is what everyone necessarily do. I'm merely saying that depending on one's knowledge and experience, and their own unique and personal tax situation, and this huge change in tax reporting becoming effective now, this is actually a critical point in many people's hobby/collecting activities to finally think about and decide how they want to be treated going forward. Since a lot of people are finally going to be forced to start reporting parts of their "hobby" activities on their tax returns, doesn't it make sense for them to think about if they want to be considered as a dealer, or maybe as an investor, or just a plain hobby collector, or even possibly a mix of all three? And if they're not sure exactly what that all means, or what they want to do, or how they may want to be considered and treated going forward, doesn't it make sense to at least talk to someone that might be able to help them to understand the differences and the pros and cons of choosing one way of being treated over another? And then maybe help to explain/show to them how their choice(s) actually gets put into their tax return. You need or want to hear that from someone with some actual tax experience, not some of the yahoos who occasionally will post on here that will tell you to just do what they say and you'll be fine, and act like they know all the answers because they heard it from so-and-so's cousin, or saw something online last night. So even if you don't want to have to hire a tax preparer, at least maybe ask around to hopefully find someone you can talk to about how to proceed going forward tax-wise. Maybe think of it like this. Someone starting out in a business usually needs to sit down and decide what kind of business do they want to start. Do they go forward as a sole proprietor, or maybe they file to become an LLC. And then again, maybe they decide it is better to incorporate, but then should they elect to file their taxes as an S-Corp, or maybe leave the taxation as a C-Corp. And then, how does that fit in with their regular job(s), other businesses, and investments, and then all the same questions for their spouse if married, and on and on. Beginning to get my drift?

Anyway, sorry again. My response was not solely directed at just your post.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-27-2022, 02:02 AM
G1911 G1911 is offline
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,419
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobC View Post
My apologies as I wasn't so much responding just to you, but also trying to explain the what's and why's of a lot of these crazy new laws and changes to everyone that may not know much about all this, or have not heard about it already.

And as to saying everyone has to hire a tax professional to do their taxes now, I'm really not suggesting that is what everyone necessarily do. I'm merely saying that depending on one's knowledge and experience, and their own unique and personal tax situation, and this huge change in tax reporting becoming effective now, this is actually a critical point in many people's hobby/collecting activities to finally think about and decide how they want to be treated going forward. Since a lot of people are finally going to be forced to start reporting parts of their "hobby" activities on their tax returns, doesn't it make sense for them to think about if they want to be considered as a dealer, or maybe as an investor, or just a plain hobby collector, or even possibly a mix of all three? And if they're not sure exactly what that all means, or what they want to do, or how they may want to be considered and treated going forward, doesn't it make sense to at least talk to someone that might be able to help them to understand the differences and the pros and cons of choosing one way of being treated over another? And then maybe help to explain/show to them how their choice(s) actually gets put into their tax return. You need or want to hear that from someone with some actual tax experience, not some of the yahoos who occasionally will post on here that will tell you to just do what they say and you'll be fine, and act like they know all the answers because they heard it from so-and-so's cousin, or saw something online last night. So even if you don't want to have to hire a tax preparer, at least maybe ask around to hopefully find someone you can talk to about how to proceed going forward tax-wise. Maybe think of it like this. Someone starting out in a business usually needs to sit down and decide what kind of business do they want to start. Do they go forward as a sole proprietor, or maybe they file to become an LLC. And then again, maybe they decide it is better to incorporate, but then should they elect to file their taxes as an S-Corp, or maybe leave the taxation as a C-Corp. And then, how does that fit in with their regular job(s), other businesses, and investments, and then all the same questions for their spouse if married, and on and on. Beginning to get my drift?

Anyway, sorry again. My response was not solely directed at just your post.
I get your drift, but I don't think it makes any reasonable sense for a few hundred dollars in sales of duplicate cards a year. I shouldn't need to treat selling $600-$20,000 of cards in 12 months like I'm starting a business. I shouldn't need to hire a professional to help me consider incorporating and in what way for selling $800 of dupes in 12 months. It makes sense to hire a professional to help make the right decisions if I'm starting a business, I'm making real money. Holding a digital garage sale for tiny amounts of money? No. That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to get a professional to give me this advice and bill me over such a tiny sum of money. After Uncle Sam gets his half and the professional gets their cut for their hours, I won't make a penny myself for all that time and risk. At least throwing the $800 in dupes into my fireplace might warm me for 15 minutes.

This is a great advertisement for exactly why these regulations are a giant pain.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-27-2022, 08:36 AM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911 View Post
I get your drift, but I don't think it makes any reasonable sense for a few hundred dollars in sales of duplicate cards a year. I shouldn't need to treat selling $600-$20,000 of cards in 12 months like I'm starting a business. I shouldn't need to hire a professional to help me consider incorporating and in what way for selling $800 of dupes in 12 months. It makes sense to hire a professional to help make the right decisions if I'm starting a business, I'm making real money. Holding a digital garage sale for tiny amounts of money? No. That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to get a professional to give me this advice and bill me over such a tiny sum of money. After Uncle Sam gets his half and the professional gets their cut for their hours, I won't make a penny myself for all that time and risk. At least throwing the $800 in dupes into my fireplace might warm me for 15 minutes.

This is a great advertisement for exactly why these regulations are a giant pain.

I laughed like heck at this. My feelings exactly.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-27-2022, 03:32 PM
puckpaul puckpaul is offline
P.aul Orl,in
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 750
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911 View Post
I think you may have replied to the wrong person, as I didn't talk about garage sales at all, or most of what you are talking about. I know how PayPal works...

Garage sales and face to face absolutely are affected though - I don't have proof of what I paid (and thus, to calculate my profit form an eBay sale) from a face to face transaction 20 years ago, or often even memory of what it was myself. As I am taxed on PROFIT, it's going to be a total pain in the ass at best to survive auditing, as I can't prove what I paid at a Card Show 15 years ago to then calculate from an eBay sale next month.

As to your last paragraph, If I have to hire a professional to make sure I don't get !@#$% by the state over a few eBay sales that I wasn't cheating about on my taxes in the first place, well.... That's exactly why this is a problem and ridiculous. It is a shift of the burden of the proof, and creates a ton of headaches. After losing 45%+ of my sale price when I can't show what I originally paid, and then hiring a professional, there's even less reason to sell. Its not much more profitable than burning my duplicates in the fireplace.
+1, this is a nuisance and an unnecessary requirement for small $ transactions for most of us. Hopefully we can vote some people in that can change this.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-27-2022, 03:46 PM
BobC BobC is offline
Bob C.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,276
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puckpaul View Post
+1, this is a nuisance and an unnecessary requirement for small $ transactions for most of us. Hopefully we can vote some people in that can change this.
Good luck with that, because the alternative is to raise current taxes or create new taxes to bring in the money they need/want. It is a given that for politicians it is better to enforce the tax laws already in place, and seek better compliance. Passing new taxes and/or raising existing taxes rates can lead to political suicide as well.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-27-2022, 03:58 PM
sb1 sb1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,217
Default

Bob,

I frequently see you refer to a person as being an "investor" for their taxable status. I have not seen this as an option, one is either in the business of buying and selling OR a collector in the eyes of the IRS. I believe some collectors will believe that by calling themselves investors they believe that their gains will be treated as either short or long-term capital gains and not the higher "collectible" rate. I do know that many collectors use the capital gains rate when figuring their taxes and have never had it questioned.

Can you enlighten us on how one would qualify as an investor in the eyes of the IRS and not fall under the collectible tax rate??
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-27-2022, 06:12 PM
BobC BobC is offline
Bob C.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,276
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sb1 View Post
Bob,

I frequently see you refer to a person as being an "investor" for their taxable status. I have not seen this as an option, one is either in the business of buying and selling OR a collector in the eyes of the IRS. I believe some collectors will believe that by calling themselves investors they believe that their gains will be treated as either short or long-term capital gains and not the higher "collectible" rate. I do know that many collectors use the capital gains rate when figuring their taxes and have never had it questioned.

Can you enlighten us on how one would qualify as an investor in the eyes of the IRS and not fall under the collectible tax rate??
Scott,

Look at all the talk we have nowadays where cards end up being discussed in the Wall Street Journal, investment news shows, and the like. In the past, cards would likely not ever have been considered as investments, but times have recently changed. Though there is no hard and fast rule or measure to definitively say whether your cards are collectibles or investment assets, I don't think the IRS can just ignore anymore that sports cards can in fact be investments.

To show and help prove to an IRS agent that your cards are investment assets, you want to be able to show how you keep track of what you have, how you keep and store things, and if you ever do sell cards, the frequency, volume, and reasons behind such sales, and so on. All of this can be used and combined to help develop and establish a narrative where, if you ever do get questioned by the IRS, you can present what you're doing as an investment activity. In a much more simplistic way of maybe looking at this, an investor is more likely to keep their cards in a bank safe deposit box, or maybe PWCC or Goldin's vaults. A hobby collector is more likely to have their collectible items sitting in a display case, hanging on a wall, or otherwise exhibited in a man cave. You get the drift.

And I believe someone can be more than just one of these types. You can have a dealer, who maintains separate business and inventory records, also have a separate and distinct personal collection he proudly displays in his man cave at home, as well as maybe some '52 Mantles and early Ruth cards he picked up over the years that are sitting in a safe deposit box and are being left to appreciate till sold at some future date. The more records, details, and data you can present to an IRS agent (on the very slim chance you ever did get questioned and audited), the more likely they are to agree with your tax returns and your treatment of the cards you sold.

In the end, an IRS agent could still argue against your claim that your cards are investments, but as long as you don't end up selling them for what could turn out to be a non-deductible capital loss, you pretty much end up with the same tax results regardless of whether you reported them as collectibles or investments. I say this because there isn't a specific statement, determination or claim in the Internal Revenue Code or IRS rulings yet, to my knowledge, that still wouldn't maybe consider the underlying definition of a sports card as a collectible to override whether the card is treated as a collectible or investment for purposes of determining if a gain from its sale is subject to the 28% max collectibles tax rate, as opposed to the max 20% long term capital gains rate on regular investments (ie: stocks and bonds). I'm assuming the IRS will expect the 28% max rate, even if a card is considered as an investment for now. So to me, for now, the main advantage of assuming a card is sold as an investment is the ability to potentially deduct and carry forward any losses generated by its sale. Need more research to be done or info collected.

I hope this helps, and again is maybe a good reason to discuss such things with your personal tax advisors. They may not agree exactly with all my thinking, but they'll know much more of your personal and tax situation, and if there any other issues or considerations for you personally that I certainly am not aware of. Hope this helps.

Last edited by BobC; 01-27-2022 at 06:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-27-2022, 05:15 PM
Kzoo's Avatar
Kzoo Kzoo is offline
Matt
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 978
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puckpaul View Post
+1, this is a nuisance and an unnecessary requirement for small $ transactions for most of us. Hopefully we can vote some people in that can change this.
At the current rate, this is very likely later this year.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help reporting a T206 Cobb fake on Ebay! hcv123 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 18 12-13-2021 03:11 PM
Reporting item on Ebay AustinMike Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 5 05-13-2013 07:14 PM
Ebay item reporting bn2cardz Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 7 01-30-2012 10:29 AM
eBay Reporting Provision Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 7 06-21-2008 09:36 PM
slightly OT: Reporting Shills to Ebay question... Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 2 10-24-2005 07:17 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:29 AM.


ebay GSB