![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would not worry about those personally. That's just the natural card stock. Even slight bowing is okay as long as it doesn't create spider creases.
But when submission prices are back down to somewhat normal, send 5 in just to confirm PSA will see it that way as a trial balloon.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A technical grading question... | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 10-07-2018 12:50 PM |
Technical question about the site | edjs | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-05-2017 10:57 AM |
Technical Question | rocarroll | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-29-2014 05:15 PM |
Eye Appeal -vs- Technical Grade | ls7plus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 05-16-2011 10:06 PM |
technical computer question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-29-2003 07:30 PM |