![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Skinned cards are ~50% of a card and sometimes the front is thinner than what was skinned and therefore could be less than 50%. I have some OJ's where skinning removed a small percentage on the face of the card. Does that make skinned OJ's containing a nearly entire front but, less than 50% no longer a card?
If you cut a Wagner with scissors leaving 51% the bottom of the card and 49% the top then does only the bottom qualify? If you "restored" the bottom half by adding 49% to the top you'd have a card worth less than the top restored with a bottom. My point is that percentages and restorations will never be able have a standard metric. Cards, no matter how complete or doctored, slabbed or discussed are only as good as their appeal to buyers.
__________________
"Chicago Cubs fans are 90% scar tissue". -GFW |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wanted. M101-1 Wagner and M110 and M 101-2 Wagner and Wagner/Cobb | iowadoc77 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 08-26-2018 06:55 PM |
Wagner cards more common than the T206 Wagner | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 69 | 05-12-2017 07:11 PM |
E92 Wagner, E102 Wagner, T205 Cobb, T206 Gandil, and M116 Mcgraw ending AM 7/29/2013 | gabrinus | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 07-27-2013 07:12 AM |
1909-11 T206 Honus Wagner vs. 1911-16 Kotton Honus Wagner: Who Has More? | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 08-29-2010 04:30 PM |
FS: T206 Heine Wagner ("the other T206 Wagner") PSA 4 - $79 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-19-2007 08:46 PM |