Best lefty off all time? My vote is Koufax!

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Snowman

Bullshit. 16 of his last 25 posts are either directly about me or mocking something I've said. And that's just page one.

You said:
All he does is post about me. From one thread to the next. His entire existence here is stalking me.

What YOU said is BS. I thought you were a statistician, since when is 16 of 25 100 percent? By lawyer math it's 64 percent.

Or maybe it's the same logic that lets you ignore half of Koufax' career lol. Only the 16 count.

[Snowman]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

You said:
All he does is post about me. From one thread to the next. His entire existence here is stalking me.

What YOU said is BS. I thought you were a statistician, since when is 16 of 25 100 percent? By lawyer math it's 64 percent.

OK captain literal. As if you didn't know what I meant by what I said.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Snowman

OK captain literal. As if you didn't know what I meant by what I said.

A man so precise with numbers who speaks figuratively. Got it.

[Snowman]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

You said:
All he does is post about me. From one thread to the next. His entire existence here is stalking me.

What YOU said is BS. I thought you were a statistician, since when is 16 of 25 100 percent? By lawyer math it's 64 percent.

Or maybe it's the same logic that lets you ignore half of Koufax' career lol. Only the 16 count.

This is the perfect example of why everyone hates lawyers. There isn't a single person here, including yourself, who is confused about what someone actually means when they say something like "all he/she does is X". Then the forum captain lawyer comes along to point out the obvious, "well actually, he did make a post about Jackie Robinson last week". Or if someone says, "all he does is sleep", you're the genius that's going to point out, "well actually, I saw him eating lunch yesterday".

I'm done playing games with you Peter. Have fun talking to the wall like you always do.

My point is clear. Lorewalker stalks me from thread to thread. He has a serious problem. The majority of his content over the past 3 or 4 months is either directly about me or mocking me. It's extremely childish.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Snowman

This is the perfect example of why everyone hates lawyers. There isn't a single person here, including yourself, who is confused about what someone actually means when they say something like "all he/she does is X". Then the forum captain lawyer comes along to point out the obvious, "well actually, he did make a post about Jackie Robinson last week". Or if someone says, "all he does is sleep", you're the genius that's going to point out, "well actually, I saw him eating lunch yesterday".

I'm done playing games with you Peter. Have fun talking to the wall like you always do.

My point is clear. Lorewalker stalks me from thread to thread. He has a serious problem. The majority of his content over the past 3 or 4 months is either directly about me or mocking me. It's extremely childish.

Of the two of us, who do you think is liked less on this forum? Let's see just how perceptive you are, Mr. statistician turned figurative.

[Lorewalker]

Originally Posted by Snowman

Lorewalker stalks me from thread to thread.

Not accurate. I have been on threads before you got there. That I addressed you in them is only because your posts warranted it. I have refrained more times than I have posted.

Originally Posted by Snowman

He has a serious problem.

I am sure I have many problems but they pale in contrast to your serious problems.

Originally Posted by Snowman

The majority of his content over the past 3 or 4 months is either directly about me or mocking me.

Oh stop it. You love the attention.

Originally Posted by Snowman

It's extremely childish.

Ok. Ya got me there but I do have a passion for collecting cards which inhibits my ability to act like an adult, at times. For a guy who insults and attacks so many people you really should be thicker skinned. You constantly put a target on yourself.

[G1911]

It turns out that insulting absolutely everyone active in a thread will make everyone in a thread unite against you. I for one am shocked at this revelation.

Waddell, Plank and Hubbell aren’t the best but they probably deserve more mentions than they have gotten. Waddell seems to me one of the great ‘could have been’s’, he had a fine career but if he’d been more mature/sane/dedicated he might be the one the serious people are debating.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by G1911

It turns out that insulting absolutely everyone active in a thread will make everyone in a thread unite against you. I for one am shocked at this revelation.

Waddell, Plank and Hubbell aren’t the best but they probably deserve more mentions than they have gotten. Waddell seems to me one of the great ‘could have been’s’, he had a fine career but if he’d been more mature/sane/dedicated he might be the one the serious people are debating.

He did complement one guy who agreed with him about something. See that's the sole criterion, someone who agrees with him gets it, everybody else is stupid.

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

He did complement one guy who agreed with him about something. See that's the sole criterion, someone who agrees with him gets it, everybody else is stupid.

Unfortunately, his point is so obviously wrong, that almost no one can agree. Though as he changes his position every time he’s cornered by the ridiculousness of his earlier contradictory positions, the individual who once agreed with him and broke the mold may no longer agree with his new hot take.

[Lorewalker]

Originally Posted by G1911

Unfortunately, his point is so obviously wrong, that almost no one can agree. Though as he changes his position every time he’s cornered by the ridiculousness of his earlier contradictory positions, the individual who once agreed with him and broke the mold may no longer agree with his new hot take.

He admitted to it yesterday when he used the word argue to describe what he sees as taking place here. Sure arguments can happen but I think most of us are here to discuss or debate, civilly. Not this dude. He comes to fight and is here just to argue. He takes a position and then he pivots when he is made to look silly, thereby changing the emphasis of the discussion, or as he refers to it, the argument. Some of the theories he has put forth as facts are hilarious.

[Carter08]

Originally Posted by G1911

It turns out that insulting absolutely everyone active in a thread will make everyone in a thread unite against you. I for one am shocked at this revelation.

Waddell, Plank and Hubbell aren’t the best but they probably deserve more mentions than they have gotten. Waddell seems to me one of the great ‘could have been’s’, he had a fine career but if he’d been more mature/sane/dedicated he might be the one the serious people are debating.

I just paid silly money for an e93 waddell. Inspiring me to learn more about him. Interesting character so far.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Snowman

This is the perfect example of why everyone hates lawyers. There isn't a single person here, including yourself, who is confused about what someone actually means when they say something like "all he/she does is X". Then the forum captain lawyer comes along to point out the obvious, "well actually, he did make a post about Jackie Robinson last week". Or if someone says, "all he does is sleep", you're the genius that's going to point out, "well actually, I saw him eating lunch yesterday".

I'm done playing games with you Peter. Have fun talking to the wall like you always do.

My point is clear. Lorewalker stalks me from thread to thread. He has a serious problem. The majority of his content over the past 3 or 4 months is either directly about me or mocking me. It's extremely childish.

Being a statistician, perhaps you can go back and compute the number of your posts with an ad hominem comment ridiculing someone, or the forum collectively?