Friday nite TRIVIA QUIZ....1st correct answer wins a T206 or DIA STAR or 1933 GOUDEY

[frankbmd]

I'm going to go with Hugh Duffy at 5:12 PT

[tedzan]

Originally Posted by frankbmd

I'm going to go with Hugh Duffy at 5:12 PT

Hi Frank

You always bring a to my face.

Take care....good buddy.


TED Z

T206 Reference
.

[Bpm0014]

Hi Frank You always bring a to my face.

Same! Frank cracks me up. Every single comment. So witty!

[G1911]

The amazing thing is that Duffy hit .440, but finished 3rd in OBP. Billy Hamilton hit .403 and drew 128 walks in 132 games. They both had monster seasons even in the context of 1894.

Duffy also has one of my favorite T206 poses. I have his Piedmont and Polar Bear, I'd try a run but some of those backs are a little out of my budget for T206's.

[Mark17]

Originally Posted by G1911

The amazing thing is that Duffy hit .440, but finished 3rd in OBP. Billy Hamilton hit .403 and drew 128 walks in 132 games. They both had monster seasons even in the context of 1894.

Duffy also has one of my favorite T206 poses. I have his Piedmont and Polar Bear, I'd try a run but some of those backs are a little out of my budget for T206's.

However, we live in days where some history is being cancelled, while other history is being re-written. According to Wikipedia:

[Tetelo]Vargas holds the major league record for best batting average in a single season. He hit .471 while playing for the New York Cubans in the Negro National League in 1943.

The Major League criteria for eligibility for a batting title is not a hard 502 PA. It is defined (and has been for a long time) as 3.1 PA per scheduled game. This way, minor leagues and even colleges can have batting leaders, although they don't have enough games for anyone to get 502 AB.

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Mark17

However, we live in days where some history is being cancelled, while other history is being re-written. According to Wikipedia:

[Tetelo]Vargas holds the major league record for best batting average in a single season. He hit .471 while playing for the New York Cubans in the Negro National League in 1943.

The Major League criteria for eligibility for a batting title is not a hard 502 PA. It is defined (and has been for a long time) as 3.1 PA per scheduled game. This way, minor leagues and even colleges can have batting leaders, although they don't have enough games for anyone to get 502 AB.

I'll leave it at stating that I think rewriting history to better suit contemporary politics is never a good thing. Vargas' 121 at bats in the the Negro National League II might be the major league record being written into the books, but it's not one I will ever place any reasonable value on as an actual major league record. Duffy holds the true mark, albeit in a period where it was a lot easier to hit .440 (true of most any record). 237 hits in 125 National League games even in high offense 1894 is a heck of a mark.

[tedzan]

Originally Posted by Mark17

The Major League criteria for eligibility for a batting title is not a hard 502 PA. It is defined (and has been for a long time) as 3.1 PA per scheduled game. This way, minor leagues and even colleges can have batting leaders, although they don't have enough games for anyone to get 502 AB.

Mark

The criteria for At Bats (AB's) is 400 for a batter's Batting Average to qualify as leader in this stat. This ruling has been established many, many years ago. You cannot in all respects
argue that a batter with less than 400 AB's (or less than 200, etc., etc. AB's) should be considered a leader in this category. The undeniable nature of this great game is such.... that
as your AB's increase, invariably your BA will decrease (as the season progresses).
Unless, of course, your name is Ted Williams.

Hugh Duffy in 1894 batted .440 with 616 Plate Appearances (237 Hits)....do you realize what an achievement that is ? It is absolutely amazing.





.



TED Z

T206 Reference
.

[Mark17]

Originally Posted by tedzan

Mark

The criteria for At Bats (AB's) is 400 for a batter's Batting Average to qualify as leader in this stat. This ruling has been established many, many years ago. You cannot in all respects
argue that a batter with less than 400 AB's (or less than 200, etc., etc. AB's) should be considered a leader in this category. The undeniable nature of this great game is such.... that
as your AB's increase, invariably your BA will decrease (as the season progresses).
Unless, of course, your name is Ted Williams.

Hugh Duffy in 1894 batted .440 with 616 Plate Appearances (237 Hits)....do you realize what an achievement that is ? It is absolutely amazing.

Yes I realize it. I'm well aware that it's a lot harder to hit for high average with 616 PA than with a third of that.

From the Baseball Rules Academy:

https://baseballrulesacademy.com/off...championships/

9.22 Minimum Standards for Individual Championships

To assure uniformity in establishing the batting, pitching and fielding championships of professional leagues, such champions shall meet the following minimum performance standards:

(a) The individual batting, slugging or on-base percentage champion shall be the player with the highest batting average, slugging percentage or on-base percentage, as the case may be, provided the player is credited with as many or more total appearances at the plate in league championship games as the number of games scheduled for each Club in his Club’s league that season, multiplied by 3.1 in the case of a Major League player and by 2.7 in the case of a National Association player. Total appearances at the plate shall include official times at bat, plus bases on balls, times hit by pitcher, sacrifice hits, sacrifice flies and times awarded first base because of interference or obstruction. Notwithstanding the foregoing requirement of minimum appearances at the plate, any player with fewer than the required number of plate appearances whose average would be the highest, if he were charged with the required number of plate appearances shall be awarded the batting, slugging or on-base percentage championship, as the case may be.

Ted, your argument is not with me. I'm just pointing out the rule, and the fact MLB has decided to "integrate" Negro League stats into the Major Leagues. These 2 things combine to bump Duffy's great performance down to 4th place:

https://www.chicagotribune.com/sport...ovq-story.html

The modern-day single-season record was held by the Philadelphia Athletics’ Nap Lajoie, who hit .427 in 1901, the AL’s inaugural season. The all-time record belonged to the Boston Beaneaters’ Hugh Duffy, who hit .440 in 1894. But now Duffy is fourth behind three Negro Leaguers — Vargas, Gibson and Charlie Smith (.451 in 1929). Lajoie’s 1901 record also fell, as he dropped from first in the modern era to ninth.

Move over, guys.


I didn't make the rules, and I didn't re-write them. If you don't like MLB's decision to integrate NL stats, again, your argument isn't with me - it's with them. And by the way, there were Major League Batting Champions last year, who had far fewer AB than the 400 number you gave.