![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earning interest? Cant you buy pwcc bonds as well?
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well they are loans, aren't they? And I would think they would have something in writing and not just be handing money over to people.
Put it this way. Even if they didn't actually list interest in their loan agreements with customers/consigners, the IRS could still impute interest using the AFR for the month the loan is made, and then based on how long the loan is for. And don't go giving them ideas about bonds, or think of that as a big joke. If they're making loans for some of the large amounts people were speculating they were handing out, unless they were sitting on a huge pile of cash to make those loans, I'm guessing they're either working with a bank and have some kind of credit line or facility in place, and/or possibly have others investing in or loaning money to them (not too far fetched from your bond idea). In fact, the idea of others loaning or investing money with them actually makes more sense than them funding everything with a credit line/facility from some bank. I have no idea how well off the owners are to be able to pledge assets to be able to collateralize a credit line with a bank. Their business itself probably doesn't really have any major assets beyond possibly land and a building(s) they may own. They aren't going to be heavy with equipment, and I doubt they have any significant inventory as pretty much everything they sell or have in the vault belongs to their customers and consigners, not them. Now they will show the loans owed to them as assets, but no bank can rely on third party loans receivable like that alone as sufficient to collateralize loans then made to PWCC. Especially when the underlying assets for everything ends up being sportscards. That is not the kind of asset bankers will likely know much about, and I would definitely feel it is not the kind of assets they'd want to end up owning if the worst case scenario ever happened. So I really don't know what PWCC is doing, but would be surprised if they don't have outstanding bonds/loans held by somebody, to allow them to operate. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
If any of you ultra purists want a sneak peek of the future of this hobby, just fly into Vegas the 3rd week of June next year and head on down to the South Point Casino to check out the chip convention and look for our friend. You can't miss him. He's the guy with the dirty chips and no one standing in front of his booth. If a card has been altered and looks mangled, the market will adjust for it. If someone gets scammed by a counterfietter or by someone recoloring or rebacking a card, there are legal recourses they can pursue. If a card has been altered but that alteration cannot be detected, then what difference does it make? If you don't trust the opinions of the TPGs, then you don't have to play that game. Feel free to buy and sell everything raw and trust your own judgment. The TPGs are just trying to render an opinion and the hobby has chosen to value those opinions. They're just people like you and me though at the end of the day. They're not infallible. It doesn't make them criminals just because people can "sneak one past the goalie", or even if they can "sneak one past the goalie" with regularity. They're just offering opinions. Hell, it doesn't even make the person who altered a card a criminal. If you honestly think that a court of law is going to find someone guilty of a crime because they bought a baseball card, cleaned it, and then resold it for more money, I think you're delusional. When someone does this in the casino chips collection hobby, it's called a "cleaning fee", and people are happy to pay more for chips that have been cleaned. If some dumbass tries to clean a chip by tossing it in a bucket of Clorox Bleach, then they're going to ruin that chip and its resale value will be greatly affected as a result. Same with this hobby. If someone tries to clean a card with some magic potion of harsh chemicals that end up ruining the card, then the market value of that card will plummet, slabbed or unslabbed. People don't like washed out looking cards any more than chip collectors want washed out looking chips. But if you still want to complain because when is able to clean a card safely, without the use of harsh chemicals, restoring it to its original state before little Billy spilled his hot cocoa on it then you've just become the old man yelling at clouds. It also doesn't make the TPGs immoral or incompetent because they couldn't detect that the card was cleaned. But if you think you can detect all these alterations with your eagle eyes, then go start up the BODA grading company where you can research every submission for 2 hours straight, scouring the internet for possible matches before giving it the BODA seal of approval (that is, until the 'before' photo later surfaces... oops, now what?). Maybe you can get a nifty little sticker to put on it like Mike Baker does? Perhaps it will demand a premium? (I know where I'll place my bets on that wager). But if you don't like the opinion of a TPG, then just get another one or don't get one at all. Who cares? At the end of the day, it's just a card. But most of us value their opinions a lot more than 'jumpinJimmy123' on eBay who lists his VG 3 cards as "near mint" on eBay. But that doesn't mean I'm buying a PSA card blindly just because it's in their holder. I'm still going to examine it for myself to see if it meets my standards. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
After several requests from PWCC asking for some sort of documentation showing bid history or why the "Congratulations! You've Won!" email along with requests for my PWCC "rep" to contact me, this is the email I received:
"Sorry for any concern caused. Sadly we have to honor the high bid. Please feel free to review our Marketplace Security page on our website to see the steps we have taken to secure our Auction. Please also feel free to reach out to Max and he will be happy to discuss this with you! https://www.pwccmarketplace.com/marketplace-security Robby Rittenhouse PWCC Marketplace" I have gone ahead and paid for the item given the low dollar amount and have requested that PWCC delete my account. I am not alleging fraud in this case but I do not trust their platform and found the whole process suspect. I would not recommend buying from the auctions not matter how good of a "deal" it appears to be. Just to make sure I am in compliance with forum guidelines, my real name is Jim McKinley.
__________________
Actively building a 1953 Bowman Color PSA Registry Set (Currently 150/160) and attempting a 1947 Tip Top Bread Set. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There's nothing inherently wrong with alterations-- so long as they are disclosed.
That disclosure rule is absolute in all areas of collecting, including in areas where alterations (restoration, etc.) are common and accepted. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Funny how 99 percent of the time with cards, they aren't.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 10-31-2021 at 03:08 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
As a collector of ephemera, it seems to me self-evident that it is not possible to "restore [it] to its original state" as you propose. These are documents from another time which have aged, not shiny objects to be polished or trimmed around the edges to look "better". I don't doubt that there are many who would agree with you, but that's my two cents. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Different hobbies, different mentalities. Most of us were taught to prize originality and to reject most alterations, and to prefer differentiation according to which cards had better survived the test of time, rather than by the quality of alterations and pure looks. At some level there is an arbitrariness to it I suppose, and a new generation is free of course to reject it and to prefer the better repaired/better looking cards, but that doesn't make my ethos stupid.
As I said two plus years ago to the NY Times reporter, and I stand by it, “Originality is the bedrock of the hobby, and it all flows from there. Most people place a premium on originality and don’t want altered cards.” Were I interviewed today, I would add that there does seem to be a significant group that doesn't really care as long as the alteration isn't too obvious.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 10-31-2021 at 02:03 PM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
I have been a Net 54 member since 2009 and have an Ebay store since 1998 https://www.ebay.com/usr/favorite_things Cards for sale: https://www.flickr.com/photos/185900663@N07/albums I am actively buying and selling vintage sports cards graded and raw. Feedback as a buyer: https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=297262 I am accepting select private consignments of quality vintage cards (raw or graded) and collecting "want" lists for higher end ($1K+) vintage cards. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Will disagree with this one. If a card has been pressed to a thinner card by people screwing it into a holder, it is altered/pressed. Just because that person thought they were protecting their card doesn't matter. The card is damaged, and should be treated as such. Not identifying pressed cards as altered also would obscure those cards with wrinkles or creases that are then pressed out.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Remember they have motivation to have you leave your money in your account with them.
The Loans they give other people ( and charge interest on) And Similar to a bank they float money. So the money you keep in your account helps keep them more liquid and use those funds to help fund the loans. This way they minimize their funds required and meet all their customers needs
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1920s Advertising Card Babe Ruth/Carl Mays All Stars Throwing Pose 1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards Rare early Joe Jackson Cards and Postcards 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I don't think that is really true because first off, they're not a bank. Banks have unbelievably strict federal and state rules and requirements they must adhere to and abide by to do what they do. And I doubt they have anything like that in place without it being public knowledge. Plus, by doing what you're saying it would put them at extreme risk if they suddenly had a lot of customers want their money back. Banks, at least federally licensed ones, can normally get short term loans from the Federal Reserve Bank to cover such cash needs/shortfalls. That option isn't available to them. Now they do have the possibility of obtaining loans through a credit line or other credit facility they may have with their own bank, but that is probably going to require such loans to be collateralized. And trust me. no U.S. bank is ever going to consider funds they're holding for their customers/consigners that they themselves don't own or have any legal right to as acceptable collateral for making a loan to them. I think the holding of funds is more along the same idea they take advantage of with the vault. Someone holding something in their vault will likely just consign it back to them to sell should they ever decide to sell it. It is easier and convenient for the seller/consigner as they don't really have to do anything. And the same kind of goes for them just holding the cash for someone they just sold something for. Now if that same seller/consigner who's money PWCC is holding sees something that PWCC is selling for someone else and buys it, they can just tell PWCC to pay for their purchase with the funds they'd been holding for them. Can have various reasons people would choose to do this. The simple ease of doing it (laziness), the fact that someone likes the idea of keeping all their card collectiing activity and financing of it separate from their other finances and activities (similar to how many people keep separate investment/retirement accounts), or how about so the spouse doesn't know about it, and so on. In any event, I think they may do this to try and keep people spending their money in their auctions/sales. PWCC gets their main income from sales commissions, and the vault and holding people's funds for them can help to keep consignments and customers flowing to their site and sales, and away from Ebay and other AHs/online sellers. No factual hard evedence, but I think it does make the most logical sense as to why they may be doing it. Last edited by BobC; 10-31-2021 at 06:17 PM. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
People
Were Using the screw downs often in conjunction with c clamps to smash and fix corners So that was in effect alterations there is no way for them to tell When it was used to smash bumped corners and square up and when was just left too long in an over tightened screwdown. There is a legit reason for what they are doing,o but it’s always easier to just call them names. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Absolutely! I completely agree with you there. The screw-down damage equating to an "alteration" is a joke. How is a corner getting squished any different from an indentation elsewhere on a card's surface? And they don't even differentiate on the flip between a screw-down damaged card and a trimmed card. I also agree that the TPGs falsely advertise their abilities. I think it's mostly born out of hubris. I think years ago, they honestly believed they'd be able to catch this stuff. After all, it's not that difficult to identify a trimmed edge when someone cuts it with an Exacto knife or a pair of scissors, or even a guillotine-style office paper cutter. The BODA threads were probably a HUGE eye-opener for them with respect to the scope of this problem (or at least it should have been). If someone has the right equipment (and clearly there is no shortage of people who do) then those trimmed cards simply cannot be distinguished from a factory edge. The fact that cards are cut with blades at the manufacturers should have made this obvious, but they thought they all had eagle eyes. It's just like all the lemmings in the Blowhard threads who all think they could easily detect any trimmed card, then they all proceed to disagree about which edges were trimmed on the cards that get posted lol. Then they all say, "just measure it" as if that's actually sufficient for determining if a card has been trimmed. The reality is, it's just not that easy to detect a I don't think it's just an issue of insufficient time being spent on each card either. Sure, given more time, they'll be able to detect more trimmed cards, but you're probably talking about moving the needle from being able to detect 22% of trimmed cards to 26% of trimmed cards or something negligible like that if they had more time on each card. They could just come clean and be honest about their limitations. Just admit that it's not possible to detect a high percentage of these and that they'll just do the best they can. The problem with that approach though is that it opens up the door to more of this behavior and fast tracks it to being more widely accepted. I think they want to see if they can still detect it. That's partly what they were hoping for when they acquired Genamint. But it's a fool's errand. The reason these cuts cannot be detected is because there simply isn't a difference there to detect. It's like cutting a piece of paper in two places with the same pair of scissors and then handing it to someone else and asking them to tell you which cut was made first by examining the cuts with a ruler and a jeweler's loupe. It would be interesting to run an experiment where we sent in large quantities of different cards, each with various alterations to each of the TPGs to see what they were able to detect and then analyze the results. I wouldn't even be surprised if the majority of alterations actually get through at every single TPG. It'd be interesting to run an experiment with the forum members too. Especially over at Blowhard where seemingly everyone thinks they could easilty catch this stuff. You could post a 20 card test, half of which have been expertly trimmed and the other half not. Ask them to identify which cards have been trimmed and on which edges, but don't tell them how many are untrimmed, just post all 20 cards blind. They'll say every single card was trimmed and the edges they identify would probably be nearly chosen at random. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Regarding the previous posts about where they ship your cards once you pay for them..........
Based on a post I read here last month, I changed, with their chat system help, my default address (or so I thought), and had the cards I won sent to me. I got them with no problem. Well, this month, I bid on, and won one card (a card that I never even knew existed, for one of my Top-4 favorite players). I just went and paid for it, and afterward, realized that the price paid was the basic bid. I guess this means my one $14 card is now going into my non-existent/never used vault "account". So, take this as a warning....... If you bid and win, and you want to actually get your winnings sent to you, you apparently need to specify that fact EVERY SINGLE MONTH, with EVERY SINGLE PAYMENT! Apparently, you cannot just change it once, and have that set as the default; it will always default back to the vault. Personally, I feel that this it far too much of a hassle, to have to repeat it every single time you pay for something. Steve
__________________
Successful BST deals with eliotdeutsch, gonzo, jimivintage, Leon, lharris3600, markf31, Mrc32, sb1, seablaster, shammus, veloce. Current Wantlist: 1909 Obak Howard (Los Angeles) (no frame on back) 1910 E90-2 Gibson, Hyatt, Maddox Last edited by Steve D; 11-23-2021 at 12:26 AM. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Click address to ship to you after winning auction. Defaults to vault but its literally the box below. There’s even a box below that to have it shipped to a completely different address…this is probably what was done last month since you couldn’t figure it out yourself and needed customer service involved. It’s simple. Last edited by notfast; 11-23-2021 at 08:27 AM. |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Well, I just "chatted" with Robby at PWCC, and he said there is no way to permanently update your account to have auction winnings automatically sent to you. The default is to the vault; and you have to go in every time you pay your invoice, and change the default to your own address. This will have to be done every single time, as the default never changes from the vault; you are just temporarily changing it to your own addres, from the vault, on a one-time basis. Steve
__________________
Successful BST deals with eliotdeutsch, gonzo, jimivintage, Leon, lharris3600, markf31, Mrc32, sb1, seablaster, shammus, veloce. Current Wantlist: 1909 Obak Howard (Los Angeles) (no frame on back) 1910 E90-2 Gibson, Hyatt, Maddox |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My recollection was that chips from the original Vegas casinos, going back to the '50s, that have long since closed and are gone, would normally be valued the most. And of course the chip's marked denomination would play a factor in its collectible value as well. Usually, the higher the chip denomination, the higher the collectible value.
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1920s Advertising Card Babe Ruth/Carl Mays All Stars Throwing Pose 1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards Rare early Joe Jackson Cards and Postcards 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson Last edited by mrreality68; 11-23-2021 at 05:19 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PWCC Auctions this evening | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 62 | 03-17-2021 09:07 AM |
PWCC Auctions | Eric72 | Hockey, Olympic, Auto Racing And All Other Cards | 16 | 01-31-2021 05:58 AM |
PWCC Auctions & Re-Lists | Phil68 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 03-13-2020 02:07 PM |
PWCC Auctions | th38larg | Boxing / Wrestling Cards & Memorabilia Forum | 13 | 12-25-2016 04:32 PM |
1952 Topps Mickey Mantle PSA 8 Offered by PWCC Auctions #9 / Change in auction biz ? | Qcards | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 10-22-2015 01:59 PM |