 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8
10-28-2021, 07:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
That is interesting. My breakout has a similarly odd profile. In cards 1-24, 18 of my 23 have '@ 1941' (missing Greenberg). In cards 25-48, only 8 of 24 have '@1941.'
That fits with earlier poster comment that 75% of the Ted Williams (#14) cards he surveyed had @1941. It hints at either a third printing or perhaps there were SPs or DPs in this set after all. Curious if others show a higher % of '@ 1941s' in 1-24 as compared to 25-48. Last edited by Kutcher55; 10-28-2021 at 07:17 AM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Variation in size on 1940 Playball | snagltooth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 07-07-2020 09:49 AM |
| 1939 joe dimaggio playball psa 2.5 QUESTION | soxfan1986 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 05-08-2015 07:20 AM |
| PSA Copyright question | smotan_02 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 03-01-2013 03:22 AM |
| copy/copyright question | Ladder7 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 11 | 05-03-2012 07:29 PM |
| 1941 Playball - Variation - Flaws - Fakes or ??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-04-2006 11:03 PM |
Threaded Mode