Knickerbocker Photo (Update)

[drcy]

It does not appear to be the Knickerbockers.

[prewarsports]

Originally Posted by drcy

It does not appear to be the Knickerbockers.

David, you might want to clarify which "knickerbockers" you are referring too as this photo has about as much chance of being the 1991 New York Knickerbockers basketball team as it has to being an 1850's shot of New York Knickerbockers baseball team.

[drcy]

Originally Posted by prewarsports

David, you might want to clarify which "knickerbockers" you are referring too as this photo has about as much chance of being the 1991 New York Knickerbockers basketball team as it has to being an 1850's shot of New York Knickerbockers baseball team.

I'll grant that it has a better chance of being the 1848 Knickerbockers than the 1991 Knickerbockers.

[Aquarian Sports Cards]

I guess I come back to a simpler problem. Why would there be a picture of 6 random Knickerbockers in street clothes?

[SteveS]

David, still can't come up with any specific features that are glaring non-matches, huh?

Scott, the 1862 pic is ten random Knickerbockers in street clothes. If I had to make a guess on mine, all six were elected team officers/directors, serving in various roles throughout the years. Perhaps this is a photograph of the officers/directors from whatever year it was taken. I can't find a record of the elections for every year.

[Aquarian Sports Cards]

Originally Posted by SteveS

David, still can't come up with any specific features that are glaring non-matches, huh?

Scott, the 1862 pic is ten random Knickerbockers in street clothes. If I had to make a guess on mine, all six were elected team officers/directors, serving in various roles throughout the years. Perhaps this is a photograph of the officers/directors from whatever year it was taken. I can't find a record of the elections for every year.

10 is a team though. 6 isn't. It doesn't prove anything, just seems weird.

[bdk1976]

I think one of the guys might be Shoeless Joe