Another no hitter last night

[todeen]

Very interesting! I didn't read any of the articles that said the game was wild. I just celebrated that the Padres lost. Go Reds for wild card #2.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

[Casey2296]

So do 8 pitchers get credited with a no no?

[molenick]

Originally Posted by Casey2296

So do 8 pitchers get credited with a no no?

The game wasn't a no-hitter...it's just that there was nine-inning stretch within the game where the Padres did not get a hit. I believe it was also the longest game (by innings) since the runner-on-second rule was instituted.

[Casey2296]

Originally Posted by molenick

The game wasn't a no-hitter...it's just that there was nine-inning stretch within the game where the Padres did not get a hit. I believe it was also the longest game (by innings) since the runner-on-second rule was instituted.

Thanks for the clarification, although it's a bit sad to see grown ass professional men play with a rule that I haven't seen since I coached little league.

[doug.goodman]

Originally Posted by molenick

The game wasn't a no-hitter...it's just that there was nine-inning stretch within the game where the Padres did not get a hit. I believe it was also the longest game (by innings) since the runner-on-second rule was instituted.

All I know is I watched 9 consecutive inning without a hit, and in MY mind (which is both a weird and a wonderful place) THAT is a no hitter.

You can call it an avocado for all I care, but I saw a no hitter, which arguably would have been even better had the Dodgers lost. With a tip of my cap to Jim Maloney.

And yes, the longest previous game since the runner started getting placed on second base in extras was 13 innings.