1909 E90-1 Joe Jackson value compared to others

[sb1]

While it may be a Joe Jackson, it's not particularly attractive. Nor, would I call it rare, SGC has graded 79, along with PSA's 92, there are certain to be well over 200+ of them in existence, perhaps more. Both of these could hold it back from achieving a higher price level.

[ullmandds]

it's quite significant in the cosmetics circles. I believe this lipstick shade Joe is sporting influenced womens' lipstick colors well into the 20's.

But seriously... compared to the value of many even more rare cobb rookies...joe jax seems kinda spendy to me???

the black sox multiplier is real!!!!

[mrreality68]

Hi,

To some the Joe Jackson Rookie Card does not have the eye appeal as other cards.
But to many it is a nice looking card.

I believe the card is under valued and under appreciated.

The Rookie Card is not that rare and you can usually find a couple on ebay for sale.

However, I believe part of the reason that the Prices are low is mostly that the higher grade cards are low in population (MOST of the population is below a 2.

But more importantly almost all that come up for sale are both low grade and most do not have a nice eye appeal. thus keeping the price down

On the private Market the prices for the higher end ones are pretty solid. I have had many strong offers also on my card.

There was a PSA 8 went pre pandemic for over $650K
Robert Edwards had a PSA 1.5 with what look like a crease left to right just below the "A" on his uniform and it went for $31K in April

There is an SGC 3 Joe Jackson on Love of the Game Auction now and it is at $34K ($40K with Buyers Premium) with approx 1 week to go. So should have a strong final price and can help set the market price.

So yes population between SGC and PSA is fairly large and they do come often for sale but the cards above a 2 come up less often and go for what I believe is some strong prices.

[G1911]

I’d be interested to hear specifically what cards it is undervalued compared against. Who has a comparable rookie going for more or similar that shouldn’t?

Personally, I think Jackson is heavily overvalued in general. A Cracker Jack Speaker sells for a fraction of a Cracker Jack Jackson, for example. People pay a fat bonus for anyone part of the Black Sox bad guys, and this card in particular. It doesn’t even look like Jackson.

[mrreality68]

Originally Posted by G1911

I’d be interested to hear specifically what cards it is undervalued compared against. Who has a comparable rookie going for more or similar that shouldn’t?

Personally, I think Jackson is heavily overvalued in general. A Cracker Jack Speaker sells for a fraction of a Cracker Jack Jackson, for example. People pay a fat bonus for anyone part of the Black Sox bad guys, and this card in particular. It doesn’t even look like Jackson.

I believe he is talking about Rookie Cards. As Cobb, Ruth, Gehrig all go for alot more as rookie cards card to Joe Jacksons Rookie.
And you are right it does not look like him. But most cards in the E90-1 Series do not look like very much like the players listed as.

[G1911]

Originally Posted by mrreality68

I believe he is talking about Rookie Cards. As Cobb, Ruth, Gehrig all go for alot more as rookie cards card to Joe Jacksons Rookie.
And you are right it does not look like him. But most cards in the E90-1 Series do not look like very much like the players listed as.

Yes I know he means rookies, that’s why I asked specifically for “comparable rookies” that sell for more or similar to Jackson but should not. Are we really going to suggest that Jackson rookies belongs above Ruth and Cobb rookies? That would seem to be absurd.

[mrreality68]

Originally Posted by G1911

Yes I know he means rookies, that’s why I asked specifically for “comparable rookies” that sell for more or similar to Jackson but should not. Are we really going to suggest that Jackson rookies belongs above Ruth and Cobb rookies? That would seem to be absurd.

Never said above their value. And should not even be close to those. But the Joe jackson cards IMO are undervalued and over time will catch on and go up. I think they have high upside. Especially as other Joe Jackson cards like the CJ cards and the 1916 Cards get more expensive the rookie card will be another option for them.

[rand1com]

Originally Posted by G1911

Yes I know he means rookies, that’s why I asked specifically for “comparable rookies” that sell for more or similar to Jackson but should not. Are we really going to suggest that Jackson rookies belongs above Ruth and Cobb rookies? That would seem to be absurd.

He is referring to other "Jackson" cards, not rookies or cards of other players from this era.

[tbob]

I think the 1910 Old Mill red border T210 is a much more desirable Joe Jackson card than the E90-1. I believe it will be more valuable long term.

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by tbob

I think the 1910 Old Mill red border T210 is a much more desirable Joe Jackson card than the E90-1. I believe it will be more valuable long term.

the om is multiples more valuable and always will be. no comparison!

[Yoda]

Originally Posted by mrreality68

I believe he is talking about Rookie Cards. As Cobb, Ruth, Gehrig all go for alot more as rookie cards card to Joe Jacksons Rookie.
And you are right it does not look like him. But most cards in the E90-1 Series do not look like very much like the players listed as.

I agree, but one of my favorite cards is the E90-1 Nap Lajoie which bears a good resemblance to his real likeness.

[puckpaul]

The E90-1 Speaker is one of my favorite cards. The Joe Jackson is often ugly, though it can look nice in the higher grades. I would like to collect the set so…have to get one at some point!