![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I hope I am wrong. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
High end is its own machine. Lower end packs and other products can make you the same amount of money. They already have retail in most major sports areas. It won’t hurt them to throw some affordable packs and blasters.
__________________
Just a collector that likes to talk and read about the Hobby. 🤓👍🏼 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lots of sentiment around the Internet about Fanatics buying Topps. Remember that Topps makes most of its money on things that are not baseball cards. They are one of the top (if not the top) non-chocolate checkout candy manufacturers in the country. They have the soccer license as well as maybe the most important non-sports property in Star Wars, plus proprietary things like Garbage Pail Kids. I don’t think Fanatics wants to be in the candy and non-sports card market.
I find it more likely that Fanatics finds a way to license the Topps name. Some kind of deal in 2024-2025 that would allow them to utilize Topps’s MLB contract for logos and team names, and then use Topps’s IP thereafter. Think of it as “Topps x Fanatics” the way Topps does other collaborations. Topps Allen and Ginter by Fanatics, or what have you. If there’s an acquisition I find it more likely they try to acquire Panini. Fanatics is huge in China, Panini is huge in Europe. They’ve got the globe covered (apologies to Australia and Africa) with that acquisition. Plus Panini has redefined two major sports in the last decade and those brand names like Prizm would be arguably more important to Fanatics than Chrome ever could be. If they wanted to be really smart about it though they’d acquire Upper Deck which would come at a fraction of the price. That gives them the Michael Jordan exclusive, plus gives them the hockey license, thereby giving them all 4 sports. And in addition to all the Upper Deck brands you also get all the Fleer brands. Nostalgia central. That’s the play Fanatics should be making. They don’t need Topps. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is the future of sports cards to be sold through Fanatics or someone else going to be digital. I heard we might wear some sort of special glasses and view our collection on the wall. Why print, package, ship cardboard, and basically cut out the middle man, look at the cost saving and profit margins--
This may sound science fiction and far out, but could this possibly be the norm for our future generations of collectors? |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Let’s hope this is the official death of the rookie shield. Ruining front of cards since it’s inception. I never understood why if they were going to put on the card why not put it on the back by the number .(You heard it here first)
__________________
Just a collector that likes to talk and read about the Hobby. 🤓👍🏼 |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Given that the NBAPA has ownership in the new Fanatics company, it was never in doubt that Panini would lose their license for the NBA. They will lose their NFL license, too, since the NFL and NFLPA have ownership in the new company as well.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reprint Replaced with "Read Description" | bmcnutt | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 05-02-2020 08:22 PM |
What replaced Toy Shop Magazine? | mmcgruff | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 02-23-2014 06:17 PM |
Will be replaced at later date | Runscott | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 8 | 01-06-2012 09:59 AM |
Did any hand made plate for any set ever have to be replaced? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 10-26-2007 06:28 AM |
NASA has been replaced | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 05-25-2002 08:00 AM |