![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I’d leave it alone, looks great just as it is. Congrats on the pick up!
__________________
Buying Kansas CDVs, Cabinets, RPPCs and other pre 1930 memorabilia. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Don’t touch it
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think it's a beautiful piece, and I would leave it as is.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's a pretty great piece (congrats) and I wouldn't do anything to change it.
Doug |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Based on the current direction of our market - I would leave it alone. When the bubble bursts, altered cards(even preserved/restored) cards may have a scarlet letter of sorts. There's no correct answer and opinions will vary. Assuming your "holy grail" might end up in other family member hands when you're gone means setting them up for success to sell later is a consideration. If that's too morbid then maybe you stumble upon one at a flea market for a quarter and sell one off(lol). I approve of restoration when it's a necessity for preservation. That concept has not been adopted in our hobby. Beautiful piece and congratulations.
__________________
"Chicago Cubs fans are 90% scar tissue". -GFW |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I really appreciate the comments, and as a result I'm leaning strongly toward leaving it as it is. When so many of the people here I have such great respect for feel so strongly, I'm definitely paying attention. It did pass my presentability threshold from the start, or I wouldn't have bought it. What got me thinking about cleaning, and possibly restoration, was this one I found in my search for other examples on the web, from a 2005 REA auction. It's tempting to think that I might be able to get mine closer to this kind of beauty with just a cleaning and/or stain removal, which I approve of in most instances with cards and memorabilia and don't really consider restoration, which is more involved with adding non-original material rather than subtracting dirt and stains that weren't there in the first place--so why not get rid of them if you can do it without changing the piece in any significant way?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's a really nice one. I've always thought this series was cool. What is the leather like to touch? I've never held one before.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll probably never know!
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Congrats Hank on picking up your Holy Grail!
I wouldn't restore the leather, however, getting it matted with an oval opening might create a more enjoyable presentation. I bought a T4 of John Tiedemann that was trimmed to the oval and I had it matted to mirror the original look. Patrick |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
'Integrity is what you do when no one is looking' "The man who can keep a secret may be wise, but he is not half as wise as the man with no secrets to keep” |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hank fantastic pickup, Congrats!
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see all kinds of shit that's happened to this thing, Michael. Tell me what you're thinking.
Last edited by Hankphenom; 07-29-2021 at 01:02 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SOLD Walter Johnson/Smoky Joe Wood photo from Johnson Estate | Hankphenom | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 5 | 10-15-2020 03:15 PM |
** Sold ** : T206 Walter Johnson Portrait / T206 Walter Johnson Pitching- Piedmont | svtPONY95 | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-29-2016 06:05 AM |
T202 Walter Johnson PSA 1 & Johnson, Cobb, Matty T206s | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 11-14-2008 07:08 AM |
Desperately Seeking Walter: WTB Lo Grade Walter Johnson 1915 Cracker Jack | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 02-24-2008 08:29 PM |
Wanted: Maple Crispette Walter Johnson, T206 Walter Johnson Rare Backs or others | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 09-09-2007 02:33 PM |