1966 Topps High's - Any uncut sheets or partial sheets known?

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by BillP

ill bid on these and hopefully learn to scan

JollyElm is right, it’s a stain or a blemish on the McFarlane miscut in almost the exact spot where the stray line is on the Skowron. That means it has to be Cuellar or Gonder but I don’t see any irregularities that would pinpoint a certain card.

[Kevvyg1026]

Check out the Tebbetts miscut on ebay (shown in post 424). Tebbetts must be above either an unidentified card (528, 566, or 590) or above Mahaffey (570). If Tebbetts is above Cuellar, then that would put 532, Monteaugue, above McFarlane.

[Cliff Bowman]

A miscut Cuellar is on eBay, maybe someone can figure out which card is below it. It's not Gaylord Perry because the two stat lines would be showing. ETA, it can't be John Sullivan either, Sullivan has a distinctive bulge on the upper left corner of his salmon stat box, so that means it has to Orlando McFarlane or Art Mahaffey, I believe.

[Kevvyg1026]

Pretty hard to distinguish between whether Cuellar is above 569 (McFarlane), 570 (Mahaffey), or 597 (Sullivan) with just that partial shown. However, the black stats lines on both the McFarlane card and the Sullivan card run closer to the pink background edge than those on the Mahaffey card, so because we see none of the lines in the pink, perhaps it is Mahaffey underneath Cuellar.

In addition, there is a severely diamond cut Cuellar card, so that may mean the Cuellar card is close to an edge. If so, then Cuellar is in the 10 slot, above Mahaffey and with Queen to its right. Then Monteagudo and Tebbetts would occupy the 8th and 9th slot respectively in that same row (Perranowski row).

If true, then only Skowron and Gonder require placement. One would be above Perry everywhere in the sheet while the other would be above Sullivan everywhere in the sheet.

[mikemb]

Nothing to add but tomorrow is the 3rd anniversary of the start of this thread.

This has been one of my most enjoyable threads and thanks to all who have contributed in some way.

It's like trying to put together a 50 year old jigsaw puzzle without the picture of the completed puzzle.

Mike

[G1911]

Originally Posted by mikemb

Nothing to add but tomorrow is the 3rd anniversary of the start of this thread.

This has been one of my most enjoyable threads and thanks to all who have contributed in some way.

It's like trying to put together a 50 year old jigsaw puzzle without the picture of the completed puzzle.

Mike

Amen to this. Thanks to all who have helped and pooled group resources. So, so close to the complete layout

[king11]

Here is a miscut of Raymond, where it appears the card to the left has a pink team name and the pattern matches up with Gonder?