![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I built the 72 set mostly over the last two years. Finished a couple months ago. I don’t remember the Murcer being difficult. In fact I don’t remember it at all. So I checked to make sure I had it. The Cey RC was a tough one although I think I have two of them now. The Carews are tough, that Koosman IA was also tough. I guess this is one of the toughest binder pages from the 70’s.
![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Cey "The Penguin" def. pricey, Dempsey a small sleeper but nothing crazy. A couple other "triple rookie" high numbers a bit more. No technical short print/confusion unlike 71 which is sort of a roller coaster of prices within the high series.... The traded cards of HOFers (Maz, F. Rob. Morgan, Carlton, etc.) obviously more expensive. The 72 set is the ultimate "the price of the whole is not worth the sum of the parts" type of set which is why dealers like to buy these sets cheap and break it up.... There is a nice thread somewhere on this net54 universe that explains which vintage sets have best breakup value and 72 is high, '69 is not for example....As has been stated 72 centering is almost always off so one that is well centered both ways is quite desirable
Last edited by mintacular; 06-29-2021 at 06:03 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wanted: 1970 or 1972 Topps Baseball Semi High and High Numbers | Tere1071 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 2 | 06-03-2021 07:12 AM |
Looking for 1972 Topps Baseball High Numbers | RAYFROMPHILLY1 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 7 | 09-06-2020 12:14 PM |
Looking for 1972 Topps Baseball High Numbers | RAYFROMPHILLY1 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 2 | 07-02-2020 07:45 PM |
(125) 1972 Topps Baseball High Numbers FS, $4 ea. (EX) | mintacular | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 2 | 06-09-2018 02:21 PM |
1972 Topps baseball high numbers | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-02-2008 10:05 AM |