![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Wish I could remember where I had seen that unused/unfolded Diamond Matchbook cover. Seem to remember it was a silver border matchbook cover and don't think the black material for the striker had been applied yet either. That could have been the reason the cover never got used then because it would have had no striker. The black borders are always going to be more expensive, so guess I'll have to suck it up one day and pay more for them when they do come up for sale. Collecting only complete matchbooks with matches in them would be super, but doubt you could ever complete the larger Diamond Matchbook sets that way. And besides, displaying or storing the matchbooks with all the matches still intact is a bit tough. When you just collect them without the matches they fold out nice and flat and can easily be put into binders with the plastic pages, like the one earlier poster showed in a picture of his set in a binder. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if some collectors would shy away from complete matchbooks with all the matches still intact for that reason alone. Good luck with your Cubs collecting. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Brian Last edited by brianp-beme; 06-28-2021 at 06:28 PM. Reason: added that is for supreme clarification |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is a great looking "proof".
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim,
I don't think it is technically what the regular card guys would call a proof. As I mentioned before, I believe that in the process if making the matchbooks they ran it through some machine that would apply the black material that became the striker for the matchbook. My guess has always been that somehow there were some sheets or whatever of these that were run, but then the striker material didn't get properly applied so that when they cut them to get to the individual matchbook covers, they couldn't go back and apply the striker material by hand, or they just didn't bother because it wasn't worth the time and effort to do it by hand. And then rather than just throw out these unusable matchbook covers, I wouldn't be surprised if someone at the plant that made them just took some of these scraps home to give out to kids and family. They are still showing the ballplayer and his bio, and therefore still somewhat collectible, just not in a complete matchbook form. Maybe calling it an uncomplete or unused scrap piece would be a better term. Kind of like what the T206 collectors get when they have a card that is missing one or more of the colors that should have been on it, if that makes sense. In this case the matchbook is missing the striker material though, not a color. Does that make any sense? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've got sets or near sets of most of the baseball issues, missing a 2-3 in a couple of sets. Agree the prices are all over, I've found the best strategy is to buy a large lot when it comes up and sell off any dupes.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agree, most collectors may want just a couple of these for a type collection so won't go after a large lot of them. Seems when you buy a large lot of them you get an even better price per matchbook as well.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That proof looks nice but there's no way I'd consider paying anything like $1,000 the ebay seller is asking for it. To the question about whether I'd buy them without the striker attached, the answer is yes (assuming the price is low to reflect that). But my preference is to have the striker intact. I've found a few checklists online. But the TCDB seems the most complete. You'll find the checklist for the 5 different series here: https://www.tcdb.com/Search.cfm?Sear...ww.tcdb.com%2F
__________________
Working on the following sets: 1916 and 1917 Zeenut, 1954B, 1955B, 1971T and 1972T |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Makes sense. I threw in the word "unused" since they never completed putting the striker material on the cover and then didn't use the cover to finish making a completed matchbook.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Also went and looked up the Ebay item, seller is asking a pretty steep amount for that Dean matchbook!!!! Don't think I've seen any Diamond Matchbook with a four figure asking price before. Ouch! Last edited by BobC; 06-28-2021 at 06:56 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Diamond Matchbooks 1934 U1, 1935 U2, 1937 U3-2 | fkw | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 06-05-2013 12:54 PM |
1934-36 Diamond Matchbooks | Sean1125 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 01-01-2013 08:42 AM |
1934-35 diamond matchbooks? | sam majors | Football Cards Forum | 2 | 01-14-2012 10:11 AM |
FS/FT: 1934 Diamond Matchbooks (Many available) | rhettyeakley | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-07-2009 09:42 PM |
1934 Diamond Matchbooks Wanted | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 10-27-2006 12:43 PM |