1910 COUPON Rossman....with EPDG wet-ink-transfer....and it's significance

[Jobu]

Here are a few examples I have saved over the years that show the WSTs definitely happened when cards were in the hands of collectors. These do not, of course, mean that WSTs could not have happened during the printing process, but they do prove that they happened after it.

An E90 Bender with a T206 Sweet Caporal transfer and a T206 Waddell with a T205 gold transfer.

[Pat R]

It's post factory as I originally said when I pointed it out to you that your
Rossman had a EPDG transfer.

Originally Posted by Pat R

Ted, What's the transfer on your Rossman coupon? I think it might be an
EPDG transfer.

Originally Posted by Pat R

It looks like paper addition on the front but with the smaller scan it's hard to tell it could be paper loss but either way it looks like it was stuck to an EPDG
at some point.

Attachment 341678

Attachment 341679Attachment 341680

Originally Posted by tedzan

Pat

Here are larger front/back scans of the Rossman card. Rossman is an EPDG no-print; therefore, how can it have an EPDG transfer ?

The Rossman card was printed with very few backs. Most likely because he was traded by Detroit to the St. Louis Browns (August 20, 1909).
Plus, his Major League career ended Sept, 3, 1909.



TED Z

T206 Reference
.

Originally Posted by Pat R

Ted, It's a "storage" transfer not a factory transfer.

Originally Posted by tedzan

Pat

You have a better eye than I.

Nice catch on the EPDG transfer on my Rossman card.


TED Z

T206 Reference
.

[nineunder71]

Who erased the ‘88’ pencil mark on the back? Haha

[oldeboo]

Originally Posted by Jobu

Here are a few examples I have saved over the years that show the WSTs definitely happened when cards were in the hands of collectors. These do not, of course, mean that WSTs could not have happened during the printing process, but they do prove that they happened after it.

An E90 Bender with a T206 Sweet Caporal transfer and a T206 Waddell with a T205 gold transfer.

Even though it's technically damage, that's a pretty neat card to look at.