|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
SGC sometime around 2 years ago suddenly became centering fanatics. I had vintage cards that would have been 7's or higher with PSA come back SGC 5's only due to centering. Whatever, but given that SGC is still somewhat more lenient than PSA on corners, the whole thing kind still seems kind of random and doesn't make a ton of sense. Another huge problem is that they seem to get it wrong frequently, and have graders who don't know how to properly compute centering ratios.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 06-02-2021 at 06:05 AM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Forgive me if I missed this in the earlier comments, but how do we know about this change from PSA? Was there an announcement, or did their submission forms just change and people noticed it?
Given how many people hate qualifiers and have for decades, can't say I'm upset, but it is an interesting development. If this would lead to sellers being more descriptive in listings across the board, I'm all for it.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd be pleased if with the new AI Computer Assisted Grading at PSA if they would be able to pick up alterations especially trimmed/re-colored cards.
I could care less what the hell they do with qualifiers. Last edited by Johnny630; 06-02-2021 at 07:49 AM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'd like to be an optimist and hope that this leads to less buying the flip and not the card, though I'm not holding my breath.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
PSA still lists 6 qualifiers on their website 2 required and 4 optional
June PSA Pop Report shows these cards were added with qualifiers: 1914 CJ #82 Cravath 1Q 1914 CJ #99 Chance 3Q Like Packs stated in an earlier post why does a PSA 1 deserve a qualifier? Also I never understood the Registry awarding more points for a PSA 1.5Q than a PSA 2Q and a PSA 2Q being equal to a PSA 1Q pointswise
__________________
Tony Collecting: 1909-1911 T206 Southern Leaguers 1914 Cracker Jack Set (96 out of 145) |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Putting PSA to the test? | mferronibc | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 12-22-2019 10:34 PM |
| Anyone putting a PSA order in | kamikidEFFL | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-09-2014 09:49 PM |
| Set You Had Most Fun Putting Together | darkhorse9 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 35 | 03-06-2012 01:47 PM |
| Putting together an almost raw monster... | kllrbee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-29-2011 12:12 PM |
| im putting in my resume to PSA | milkit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 08-04-2010 06:25 PM |