![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you are trying to catch up from a major overload, this was an easy decision to make. Frankly, it's overdue.
__________________
Look for our show listings in the Net 54 Calendar section |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not a fan of the change but I understand why they're doing it. It will now become more challenging to find diamonds in the rough and you'll see sellers start adding more opinion into their pricing to explain why their lower grade card has more qualities than it deserves.
__________________
N300: 11/48 T206: 175/524 E95: 24/25 E106: 4/48 E210-1: Completed December 2013 R319: 43/240 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it's a great change and overdue as well. Some of the qualifiers just didn't make any sense. For example, why would a PSA 1 card require a qualifier? 1 is the lowest grade you can get.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That sucks. I was hoping they would add some more qualifiers. I have a ton of mint cards if they would add (W) for wrinkles, (MC) but for Major Creases, (RC) for Rounded Corners, and of course (HP) for holes/hole punch.
![]() ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So does that mean the guys who currently own PSA 5 (MC) can now send in for re-holder and have them come back as straight 3s? (yeeah)
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 216/520 : 41.22% |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
you've gotta love the consistency!
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
rube front.jpg rube back.jpg |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
LOL looks like that version of Hank was partying with Jimi Hendrix.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 05-27-2021 at 02:22 PM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If that was a 1969 Topps, I’d say it’s the Woodstock variation.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Items for sale or trade here UPDATED 3-16-18 |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
man this will wreak havoc on an ex member's business model
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions Last edited by Aquarian Sports Cards; 05-27-2021 at 08:36 PM. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
SGC did a good job with the Herzog.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 05-27-2021 at 10:02 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Putting PSA to the test? | mferronibc | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 12-22-2019 09:34 PM |
Anyone putting a PSA order in | kamikidEFFL | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-09-2014 08:49 PM |
Set You Had Most Fun Putting Together | darkhorse9 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 35 | 03-06-2012 12:47 PM |
Putting together an almost raw monster... | kllrbee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-29-2011 11:12 AM |
im putting in my resume to PSA | milkit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 08-04-2010 05:25 PM |