 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
05-22-2021, 08:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
[QUOTE=steve B;2105603]Those are cool defects.
+ 1 
|
|
#3
05-28-2021, 02:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Jim Gott doesn't look like a print defect, rather damage after the fact. There are various solvents that one could get their thumb on (and it shows evidence the damage is caused by a finger or thumb) that can cause this type of thing. I still like them all the same but I keep "damaged" cards separate from printing errors in my misc card binder.
|
|
#4
05-31-2021, 10:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not sure about the Gott, but there a few cards which I think do have production process finger prints posted in the never ending variations thread. They were recurring but not on all versions of the cards
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 1978 topps print defects | 4reals | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 1 | 06-12-2020 04:38 PM |
| FS: 1972-1977 print defects lot | 4reals | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 2 | 06-12-2020 12:58 PM |
| FS: 1989 Topps Print Defects | 4reals | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 06-12-2020 12:19 PM |
| Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
| Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
Hybrid Mode
