 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
05-18-2021, 09:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Current projects: White Sox prewar type set White Sox T206 Master set 1952 Topps set 
|
|
#2
05-20-2021, 07:14 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wish PSA had a qualifier for creases....
Quote:
True. Common wisdom says that 5’s will not have creases or wrinkles on the front, but that’s not always the case. I once had a ‘55 Bowman Kaline that looked like an 8 from an arm’s length; razor sharp corners - but the front had some light, but rather large for what it was - wrinkling. It was graded a PSA 5. I think that’s pretty misleading. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 05-20-2021 at 07:20 AM.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA (MK) Qualifier | STL1944 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 09-08-2016 05:02 PM |
| Would this get a MK qualifier? | JoeyFarino | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 07-29-2015 11:38 AM |
| (ST) PSA Qualifier | OldEnglishD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-10-2015 05:30 PM |
| PSA with qualifier vs SGC | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-10-2012 06:04 PM |
| How is T206 not an MC Qualifier? | usernamealreadytaken | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 09-10-2010 11:28 AM |
Hybrid Mode
