![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Glad I am not the only collector who subscribes to this exceedingly simple concept....
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have a handful of PSA 4's. None have creases. Registration and centering are easier to see in pictures than creases.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I wish PSA, SGC, and Beckett had grader's notes.
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (135/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (195/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have seen PSA 7s and even 8s that have tiny wrinkles. It's very difficult for a card to have true surface integrity, especially it seems when it comes to cards from the 1970s.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA (MK) Qualifier | STL1944 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 09-08-2016 05:02 PM |
Would this get a MK qualifier? | JoeyFarino | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 07-29-2015 11:38 AM |
(ST) PSA Qualifier | OldEnglishD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-10-2015 05:30 PM |
PSA with qualifier vs SGC | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-10-2012 06:04 PM |
How is T206 not an MC Qualifier? | usernamealreadytaken | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 09-10-2010 11:28 AM |