![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To me, the bottom left corner looks unnatural. Maybe it's the left edge alongside it or bottom edge but that whole area just doesn't look right. Also, the entire length of both edges look stunningly perfect although wear overall is minimal and a very nice card, those side edges are absolutely perfect, maybe too perfect?
Last edited by bcbgcbrcb; 03-30-2021 at 05:11 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The thing is, the card is longer top to bottom than the 1.5 I got graded, so if it’s trimmed on top/bottom it still has more cardboard than the one they gave a number too.
On the sides, I hear you but when I place the card over the graded one it lines up perfectly. The edges line up same width. I also can’t detect any abnormalities along the edges when I place them against a straight line ruler. It’s a head scratcher for me. Last edited by Chesbro41; 03-30-2021 at 05:30 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
it is definitely possible for a larger T206 to be trimmed, while a smaller is not.
__________________
Deals Done: GrayGhost, Count76, mybuddyinc, banksfan14, boysblue, Sverteramo, rocuan, rootsearcher60, GoldenAge50s, pt7464, trdcrdkid, T206.org, bnorth, frankrizzo29, David Atkatz, Johnny630, cardsamillion, SPMIDD, esehombre, bbsports, babraham, RhodeyRhode, Nate Adams, OhioCardCollector, ejstel, Golfcollector, Luke, 53toppscollector, benge610, Lunker21, VintageCardCo, jmanners51, T206CollectorVince, wrm, hockeyhockey Collecting: T206 Monster #236 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That bottom, left 1/4 has definitely been trimmed.
The edges might measure, but they don’t all the way across the bottom, I guarantee. It’s so in-evenly trimmed I almost got sea sick looking at the wave. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They are idiots. It is as simple as that.
The first card was “bent and then torn” by the original owner, the second was trimmed with scissors by the original owner. There is no reason to give the second one an Authentic grade other than the grader doesn’t know what they are looking at. You were meant to trim the coupon off so if they are designating that the coupon is off it shouldn’t matter what method of removal was used.
__________________
Check out my YouTube Videos highlighting VINTAGE CARDS https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbE..._as=subscriber ebay store: kryvintage-->https://www.ebay.com/sch/kryvintage/...p2047675.l2562 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Tony Biviano |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That’s my point. Almost all Zeenuts are cut at the bottom. They had a grader that missed it.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Zeenut cards of players with major league experience (and only one Zeenut issued) | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 03-11-2024 02:54 PM |
Zeenut HOF Gomez, Averill + Jewish player Mishkin in trade for 1929 Zeenut Nevers | brianp-beme | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 11-08-2014 08:00 PM |
Paying $2,000 for a 1925 Zeenut Lloyd Waner & $3,000 for a 1915 Zeenut Stan Coveleski | bcbgcbrcb | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 06-19-2010 05:34 AM |
Zeenut Grading question? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-06-2006 02:52 PM |
Zeenut grading question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 12-21-2004 10:04 AM |