SGC Grading - 1963 Topps Aaron

[Eddiez]

You probably did good getting that grade. I would have guessed it would grade 1 to 1.5 with the surface issues. Still a good card to have.

[GasHouseGang]

Sorry, but I'd be very upset if I bought that as a 5. Just sayin'

[carlsonjok]

Originally Posted by GasHouseGang

Sorry, but I'd be very upset if I bought that as a 5. Just sayin'

I didn't. I won it in a group break already graded, so it cost me a whopping $15. It is more a point of curiosity, as the surface blemishes aren't particularly noticeable unless you examine it at an angle under a bright light. I'm going to hang on to it, in case I ever start a 1963 set, though that Rose RC is intimidating.

[bigfish]

Originally Posted by Eddiez

You probably did good getting that grade. I would have guessed it would grade 1 to 1.5 with the surface issues. Still a good card to have.

Agree.

I think you got a 2.5 because of eye appeal. They got it right.

[ASF123]

It is more a point of curiosity, as the surface blemishes aren't particularly noticeable unless you examine it at an angle under a bright light.

It has a flaw that’s visible without magnification?? Off with its head!!