![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree with the original sentiment. I find it hard to get excited about this set. Something about it is really underwhelming. I like the 39 Play Ball set just fine so it's not that it's black and white.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think that this was a good buy given the market direction The graded Hall of Fame Rookie Card premium makes it a set with considerable upside. Also, it's not like there are a lot of nice 48 Bowmans out there that will tilt the supply once they get graded.... This could/will impact the newer rookies that are selling at higher prices everyday especially those from the "wax junk era" -- many many more of them are getting graded as we speak.< Check out prices on 1988 Fleer John Smoltz >
Okay that's my "investor" schtick... As a collector these cards are not very appealing although they have a certain minimalist appeal. Bowman was just starting out and didn't include very many subjects and not every team is represented. Moreover, they did not include the two biggest names available at the time: Ted WIilliams and Joe Dimaggio. Nor does it include the most important newcomer: Jackie Robinson. Last edited by Misunderestimated; 03-18-2021 at 10:47 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It does seem like the buyer got a good deal. And the seller did no favors by not listing the grades of the HOF rookies, which could have easily been done as the sub-heading instead of "SUPER HIGH END," but at least in the description.
People have posted about B&W cards being less desirable in a few places, but I really enjoy B&W photography and cards, and I think some individual B&W cards can be more appealing than individual colorized cards (whether based off a B&W photo or an artist's rendition). The 48 Bowman Musial is striking to me, and continues to be a good deal even in this market. And on another note, nice disclaimer at the end of the first post to keep things on topic for the conversation! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Amazing. I bought this set in VG-EX condition back around 1990 - before TPGs - and still have it and spent under $200 on it. Not the most appealing set, agreed, but historically important.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Probstein sucks.
![]() ![]()
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar. The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here My Online Trading Site: Click Here Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com My Humble Blog: Click Here |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ha. Knew someone couldn’t resist.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Probstein and scg | nicknock-2013 | Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum | 5 | 04-21-2017 06:04 PM |
Probstein | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 03-31-2016 05:24 PM |
Probstein BIN's | Econteachert205 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-18-2014 09:40 PM |
Another Probstein LOL | bnorth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 295 | 12-12-2013 06:47 PM |
anyone here win the N43's from probstein? | 1880nonsports | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-17-2013 09:41 PM |