![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Grading done consistently to the generally agreed upon standards adopted by the big 3 is what the majority of collectors want. It's the consistency that's maddening, leading to the suspicion of purposeful misdoing and froth you seen on this chat board. No one needs a 1.5 to be a 2.5 because there's a feel good factor over not damning a card with over harsh judgement. It's fine as a 1.5, the card is still whatever the card is upon visual inspection regardless of the number on the flip. You want that Mays to be where it is? So where does this Mantle need to be bumped to? (Zero creases/wrinkles). ![]() It's gotta be a 4 right, even though the back has wax stains and spots of paper loss? ![]() So without paper loss and wax stains, what does the card now deserve to be? You're just opening more cans and finding more worms no-one will be able to navigate or agree upon. My card's a 2, 2.5 on a great day. That Mays is a 1.5, at best IMO. CSG are setting themselves up for lack of credibility, as well as the very worrying possibility some buyers who think the flip number must be an honorable one from a TPG and pay a price they'll never re-sell it for. CSG should stick to modern and overgrade if anything, much more likely to find a niche that is accepted that way. Just added this to my collection the other day....may the reign of critical grading and high standards live long. This 2.5 for the miscut at top and a tiny surface dent. ![]() Last edited by 68Hawk; 03-17-2021 at 12:31 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I disagree with the current scale and would prefer a grade of about 4 for that Russell. Great card, despite the OC.
I know that people are acclimated to the current system and no new grading company is likely to change it anytime soon. I just wish that someone would. As for the Mantle... Does the staining go through to the front? Or is that dark center area just a shadow of some kind? |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That Bill Russel is laughable at a 2.5 It looks fantastic. The only problem I see is the centering, which AFFECTS PRACTICALLY EVERY 1961 FLEER you look at!!!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree the Mays is over graded. Also that the flip is a HUGE detractor. Agree with an earlier comment that the biggest problem lies between gross inconsistency and gross incompetency! Anyone care to guess the grades on these?
__________________
I have been a Net 54 member since 2009 and have an Ebay store since 1998 https://www.ebay.com/usr/favorite_things Cards for sale: https://www.flickr.com/photos/185900663@N07/albums I am actively buying and selling vintage sports cards graded and raw. Feedback as a buyer: https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=297262 I am accepting select private consignments of quality vintage cards (raw or graded) and collecting "want" lists for higher end ($1K+) vintage cards. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
One day I'm going to pony up and get a real photographer to take high quality 'merch' pics of all my stuff and upload on a cloud somewhere. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I participated in a group submission to CSG and sent 15 cards. All modern era cards within the last 10 years or so. I just don't think the flip would look good with a vintage card in it and that Mays proves it.
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
At the end of Feb I sent in cards to CSG @ 3 different levels--Bulk, Economy & Standard--all w/ different completion dates. Just got word that Standard & Economy are ready to ship & Bulk will be a bit longer (as expected).
Anxious to see the results as they are ALL cards I plan on Selling as I continue to liquidate my life-long collection.
__________________
I've learned that I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
turnaround. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am keeping track of everything & will give a report as I receive cards back. I am thinking I will get my Standard order (25 days) back this coming week--it would be nice to get them that fast! We''ll see!!
__________________
I've learned that I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy it. Last edited by GoldenAge50s; 03-20-2021 at 05:50 AM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I think the consensus here is that CSG is not really going after the vintage market. Think about it. If you were starting this business would you go after the business that PSA and SGC have a monopoly on? And to make that decision easier, the market where they aren’t making any new cards? It’s obvious that HGA and CSG are going after the modern market and I don’t blame them. Millions of new cards made every year and the younger generation are more open to change. Just my 2 cents.....
__________________
Dan |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1961 Topps high-series 33 card lot and 8 card lot...**lots moved to Ebay** | 1966CUDA | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 11 | 03-11-2020 07:26 PM |
Can Not find a comp for this card anywhere. | EYECOLLECTVINTAGE | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-31-2018 07:27 PM |
Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 12:52 PM |
raw card grading in ebay listings | keating3620 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 07-25-2011 07:24 PM |
gma grading / wagner card on ebay | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-19-2007 09:11 PM |