![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks to me like there is a half moon chip out of the paper at 3 oclock.
If so, got no problem with the grade. People can still choose to pay '3' grade money for that card if they want a stunner and not a flip. Card will re-sell again down the line to someone else who similarly values the eye candy at above 'standard' for the grade. Last edited by 68Hawk; 03-14-2021 at 08:55 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A technical grading question... | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 10-07-2018 12:50 PM |
I appeal to your desire for eye appeal with 3 appealing cards | frankbmd | T206 cards B/S/T | 5 | 01-31-2017 09:00 PM |
Growing appeal of...eye appeal? | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 06-13-2015 12:36 AM |
Eye Appeal -vs- Technical Grade | ls7plus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 05-16-2011 10:06 PM |
Technical Difficulties - Sorry. | hugginsandscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-26-2011 03:17 PM |