Quote:
Originally Posted by perezfan
I understand your point, but the rough cut can vary just as much as centering can. The same card in the set can have a very rough cut one time, and virtually a straight cut the next.
I agree with you, that cards should be penalized for bad centering. But seems like there is far more random leniency and forgiveness with regard to severe rough cuts.
|
I think the card posted is being penalized for a rough cut. I think to the extent that there is 'chipping' on the surface near the edges, it is certainly penalized. Perhaps the author can share scans of the front, and clarify what the position is on the card. Is he saying it should be a 4?
With the info provided, it looks like a 5 is reasonable based on the corner and edges that I can see from the back scan.
__________________
Deals Done: GrayGhost, Count76, mybuddyinc, banksfan14, boysblue, Sverteramo, rocuan, rootsearcher60, GoldenAge50s, pt7464, trdcrdkid, T206.org, bnorth, frankrizzo29, David Atkatz, Johnny630, cardsamillion, SPMIDD, esehombre, bbsports, babraham, RhodeyRhode, Nate Adams, OhioCardCollector, ejstel, Golfcollector, Luke, 53toppscollector, benge610, Lunker21, VintageCardCo, jmanners51, T206CollectorVince, wrm, hockeyhockey
Collecting: T206
Monster #236
|